It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: nwtrucker
a reply to: Indigo5
OK, in the long term, pipeline transportation is cheaper than rail. Granted.
The oil WILL move either way. The cost? That will be passed onto the consumers, just like every other industry, that's thee and me.
Once again, they will make their money either way. FACT. Deal with it...
Federal analysts have warned that producers in the Canadian oil sands — slated to be a top consumer of the pipeline — will need oil prices to stay between $65 and $75 a barrel to make production there economically feasible.
Let's increase the national gas tax and ENFORCE those revenues be used exclusively on infrastructure.That would take care of that issue permanently! On going revenue for ongoing repairs and expansion...works for me.
The rest of your post? Sorry, the 'oil barons' have zero interest on how the oil gets to the refineries. Rail or pipeline, they get their money either way.
The oil WILL move either way. The cost? That will be passed onto the consumers, just like every other industry, that's thee and me.
originally posted by: nwtrucker
a reply to: zazzafrazz
Good question, at a guess, the refineries down south need the crude. the products from those refineries are intended for south consumption...at least until the laws restricting exports are changed....
originally posted by: nwtrucker
a reply to: buster2010
Come on! Your smarter than that! Tax the oil companies??? Really?
Who do they pass it on to....HELLO. US.
No difference that I can see...as long as that revenue is mandated to infrastructure either way is fine.
east where?
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: nwtrucker
a reply to: zazzafrazz
Good question, at a guess, the refineries down south need the crude. the products from those refineries are intended for south consumption...at least until the laws restricting exports are changed....
Well looking at a map...the pipeline would run to the Gulf of Mexico affording easy shipping East. I believe that is the intent.
originally posted by: nwtrucker
a reply to: buster2010
More ignorance. Short term, all the refined products are intended for U.S. consumption.
There are federal restrictions on exports.....for now.
Straight Talking: Exports
Dispelling inaccurate and misleading claims about exports
It’s important for us to address inaccurate and misleading claims that continue to be made regarding the Keystone XL Pipeline and false information on exports, including the export of crude oil and the export of refined products from the United States.
Keystone XL Pipeline will NOT export crude oil
You’ve probably seen or heard claims that Keystone XL will export crude oil to China or other far-off lands. This isn’t true and here’s why.
Straight Talking: Exports
originally posted by: zazzafrazz
east where?
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: nwtrucker
a reply to: zazzafrazz
Good question, at a guess, the refineries down south need the crude. the products from those refineries are intended for south consumption...at least until the laws restricting exports are changed....
Well looking at a map...the pipeline would run to the Gulf of Mexico affording easy shipping East. I believe that is the intent.