It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Echtelion
originally posted by: Greathouse
originally posted by: BornAgainAlien
a reply to: Greathouse
So you`re telling us Nukeland, the son of a Biden, Poroshenko, Yatsenyuk, etc. are all Russian agents?...hmmm, interesting.
A brain is only worth something when it contains the right knowledge.
Oh nuclear war I've been hearing that since the 70s. Ain't going to happen.
The US neither has confronted Russia directly since the '70s. But if that happens, where will you be to face the consequences... in one of those underground bases, or outside on the surface?
originally posted by: Greathouse
originally posted by: Echtelion
originally posted by: Greathouse
originally posted by: BornAgainAlien
a reply to: Greathouse
So you`re telling us Nukeland, the son of a Biden, Poroshenko, Yatsenyuk, etc. are all Russian agents?...hmmm, interesting.
A brain is only worth something when it contains the right knowledge.
Oh nuclear war I've been hearing that since the 70s. Ain't going to happen.
The US neither has confronted Russia directly since the '70s. But if that happens, where will you be to face the consequences... in one of those underground bases, or outside on the surface?
Apparently you've forgotten about Afghanistan. Basically this the same thing oh and the Soviets lost in Afghanistan remember.
originally posted by: ufoorbhunter
originally posted by: Greathouse
originally posted by: Echtelion
originally posted by: Greathouse
originally posted by: BornAgainAlien
a reply to: Greathouse
So you`re telling us Nukeland, the son of a Biden, Poroshenko, Yatsenyuk, etc. are all Russian agents?...hmmm, interesting.
A brain is only worth something when it contains the right knowledge.
Oh nuclear war I've been hearing that since the 70s. Ain't going to happen.
The US neither has confronted Russia directly since the '70s. But if that happens, where will you be to face the consequences... in one of those underground bases, or outside on the surface?
Apparently you've forgotten about Afghanistan. Basically this the same thing oh and the Soviets lost in Afghanistan remember.
The Russians withdrew leaving their chosen government in power. They did not lose. If yoy want an example of that look at the Yanks in Nam. They did lose that one to the other side, a bunch of rice paddy farmers.
originally posted by: ufoorbhunter
The Yanks lost properly in Nam. They ran off with tail between their legs quite literally.
Russia left in an orderly withdrawl leaving its chosen government in power.
You do notice the difference don't you?
a reply to: Greathouse
originally posted by: ufoorbhunter
... Putin's got this one figured out perfectly............................ Next stop Mariupol
originally posted by: Greathouse
originally posted by: ufoorbhunter
The Yanks lost properly in Nam. They ran off with tail between their legs quite literally.
Russia left in an orderly withdrawl leaving its chosen government in power.
You do notice the difference don't you?
a reply to: Greathouse
The Yanks ran off, the Russians didn't.
Putin's done Minsk so he can gain a little time. As long as Obama stays put then who's gonna stop Putin? Britain with its fifty planes? France with its handfull of tanks? The Germans with their mind controlled foreign adventure objections? I don't think so. Putin doesn't either.
That's funny lol
By the way your term "yanks "the Aussies were actively fighting and Brits were supporting
Soviets got their asses handed to them in Afghanistan. And left a pupet in power and ran. Just like the US did in Vietnam, again the differences is I can admit it you cannot.
It all has to do with credibility brother.
originally posted by: Greathouse
originally posted by: ufoorbhunter
The Yanks lost properly in Nam. They ran off with tail between their legs quite literally.
Russia left in an orderly withdrawl leaving its chosen government in power.
You do notice the difference don't you?
a reply to: Greathouse
That's funny lol
By the way your term "yanks "the Aussies were actively fighting and Brits were supporting
Soviets got their asses handed to them in Afghanistan. And left a pupet in power and ran. Just like the US did in Vietnam, again the differences is I can admit it you cannot.
It all has to do with credibility brother.
originally posted by: noeltrotsky
originally posted by: ufoorbhunter
... Putin's got this one figured out perfectly............................ Next stop Mariupol
After the Russians lost the Cold War and the Soviet Union collapsed one would think they learned that how the economy performs is important. Put a gun in a Russian hand and they forget everything and start shooting.
originally posted by: ufoorbhunter
The Aussies to get invoved true. Brits stayed out of that one, just deserts for betraying them over Suez. You are sort of correct in that Russia and USA were both given a spanking by these Asians in that era. With modern tech it would have been a different story.
originally posted by: Greathouse
originally posted by: ufoorbhunter
The Yanks lost properly in Nam. They ran off with tail between their legs quite literally.
Russia left in an orderly withdrawl leaving its chosen government in power.
You do notice the difference don't you?
a reply to: Greathouse
That's funny lol
By the way your term "yanks "the Aussies were actively fighting and Brits were supporting
Soviets got their asses handed to them in Afghanistan. And left a pupet in power and ran. Just like the US did in Vietnam, again the differences is I can admit it you cannot.
It all has to do with credibility brother.