It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
a reply to: soulwaxer
Anyone still believing that fire brought that building down is lost in confusion. All the evidence points straight to controlled demolition. ALL of it! All the video, all the photos, all the audio, all the documents, all the witness testimonies, and all the events that transpired after 9/11 in the Middle East.
Tell you what,
Debunk this thread point by point then come back and tell us how "all the evidence points straight to a controlled demolition".
originally posted by: Flatcoat
This fellow makes a few interesting observations about the NIST report...
originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: Zcustosmorum
Funny, for someone who said they were done talking to me, you are still going.....
So, back to the original post, WTC 7 was heavily damaged and on fire. FDNY was positive it was going to collapse, so they got out of the way. Hours later, it collapsed.
originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: AgentSmith
But if it was for an ulterior motive I'm pretty sure the most likely thing is something we know happens, covering up 'cost saving' so the money can go elsewhere.
Is it that or that things were under engineered?
When you engineer fire protection for a building you ASSUME you will have water.
Has any one claimed any sky scraper is fire proof?
Or do they say it's fire rated for 'x' minutes so people can get out.
If NYFD had water I believe they would have saved 7.
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: AgentSmith
But if it was for an ulterior motive I'm pretty sure the most likely thing is something we know happens, covering up 'cost saving' so the money can go elsewhere.
Is it that or that things were under engineered?
When you engineer fire protection for a building you ASSUME you will have water.
Has any one claimed any sky scraper is fire proof?
Or do they say it's fire rated for 'x' minutes so people can get out.
If NYFD had water I believe they would have saved 7.
I remember seeing a guy who worked in 7 and when he was in the lobby, there wasn't any fire above and he was injured when bombs went off below him. but he got out.
But he is dead now.
Can water put bombs and explosives into a "dud" or a "fizzle" mode?
It took so long to finish WTC 7 off, because they had to be absolutely sure that no one did video film the actual explosion at those lower few floors. They first checked for any film crews or private camera holders. After that, they just had to use their usual doubt sowing at the main stream outlets, for the next years.
Thoughts? samkent
originally posted by: Anthem0
The funniest aspect of these threads are the one-sided application of the necessity of evidence/proof. The proof backing the OS is non-existent by design, but this doesn't bother the OS-supporters in the slightest.
- Why was ALL the material evidence of all three collapsed WTC buildings immediately shipped overseas and destroyed, despite this being an unforgivably egregious breach of protocol during a crime investigation? Because they already knew what happened so no need to investigate! Amiright?!
- Why did the government confiscate all video evidence around the area of the Pentagon? Why haven't they shown any of these videos (aside from the few frames showing "something" hitting the Pentagon...you have to take their word for it that it was an airplane because it's absolutely not clear from the video)? Because NONE of these videos showed ANYTHING! Obviously, or they would have shown us!
- Why haven't they released any airport videos of ANY of the hijackers actually boarding any of the crashed planes? One video of two guys getting on a previous connecting flight from that morning all they've shown. Again, this evidence MUST exist if the OS is true.
- Where's the proof that flight 93 buried itself in Shanksville? They told us they extracted 95% of the plane from underground, but once again provide no proof other than their own infallible word...
- Why were none of the planes intercepted? Simple incompetence of course! Duh!
Sure, you can contrive paragraphs of unlikely but theoretically possible answers to all these questions, but there is also a singular simple alternative which answers these questions and every other head-scratching aspect of that day: they (the government) are LYING about and covering up what actually happened.
The government has provided NO evidence or proof for a number of assertions made in the OS. You literally have to take their words for it that this evidence/proof even exists. They even went so far as to destroy all the physical evidence from the towers. Then they confiscated all video evidence of planes near the Pentagon and of the hijackers even existing and refused to show any of it. Then they (potus and vp) testified in private and not under oath. Then they deliberately fought against a commission even being formed to investigate the crime of the century. No matter how you cut it, this is not the behavior of honest people who have nothing to hide. You're free to believe what you will, but demanding proof/evidence from people questioning the OS, which is itself a theory with absolutely NO proof/evidence supporting it, is the height of trolling.
To all skeptics of the embarrassing OS, I highly recommend you quit feeding these trolls. There's nothing to be gained by engaging with someone who (after being introduced to the growing conspiracy) genuinely believes such a story as the OS, and even less to be gained by engaging with the obvious alternative...
originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: Anthem0
Your first point "All the material was immeadiately shipped overseas and destroyed" Does not even begin to resemble reality. First, the last of the debris was not removed from the site until Memorial Day weekend 2002. Second, it was all taken to one of four landfills where it was gone through by investigators/search teams. Third, it did not all go overseas.
Your second point "Government confiscate all video evidence around the area of the Pentagon" They did not. They had 12 videos from the Pentagon and the area around it. ALL the videos have been released at this point.
Your third point "they haven't released airport video" You are assuming that such video exists, in 2001, not a tremendous amount of video surveillance at the gates of the airports.
Your fourth point "proof that Flight 93 hit the ground in Shanksville" Just how many people are you willing to accuse of lying over the mess they found? Not to mention Nevin Lambert who LIVED close enough that he witnessed Flight 93 slam into the ground.
Your fifth point " Why were none of the planes intercepted?" We did not know it was an attack until the SECOND airliner hit the Towers. Flight 77 popped back up too late for any alert aircraft to get to it, only Flight 93, delayed as it was had a chance of being intercepted. And there were F-16s over DC waiting for it to show up.
There has been more evidence provided that I can enumerate in a post on ATS, people like you, are unwilling to accept anything that does not agree with the crap you have read on conspiracy sites.