It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: NotMoose
originally posted by: EyesOpenMouthShut
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“I think it’s one I can illustrate the point,” Tillis told the women. “I said, I don’t have any problem with Starbucks if they choose to opt out of this policy as long as the post a sign that says ‘We don’t require our employees to wash their hands after leaving the restrooms.’ The market will take care of that.”
“That’s probably one where every business that did that would go out of business,” he added. “But I think it’s good to illustrate the point that that’s the sort of mentality that we need to have to reduce the regulatory burden on this country.”
Did any of you who are so horrified actually read THE WHOLE QUOTE? He wasn't actually advocating getting rid of hand-washing, he was saying that we go over the top in legislating every tiny detail, and that if we stopped, the market would take care of it for us. If you knew a restaurant didn't require employees to wash their hands, would you eat there? No? Well, that's exactly what he's saying.
originally posted by: tom.farnhill
a reply to: olaru12
it seems to me that he does not like restaurants much, because if such a notice was posted i can't see them doing any business and they would have to close down in no time at all
originally posted by: AshleyD
I almost thought it would be a joke at the expense of Anti-Vaxers.
Then I noticed the irony. He wants to ease regulations by not enforcing hand washing. But then he wants to regulate that by enforcing them to post signs that say they don't make employees wash hands after using the restroom. Ok...
originally posted by: Edumakated
The guy gave a completely bad example, but I know what he was trying to say. This is what is wrong with politics. Media and partisans try to play this gotcha game instead of actually discussing the issues.
There are so many bad and unnecessary regulations on the books that are burdensome to businesses and do nothing to help the consumer. I see it everyday in my industry where we spend an inordinate amount of time trying to comply with regulations that sound good in theory, but completely useless in practical terms.
Washing hands is necessary and critical to hygiene. However, realistically, how can govt actually enforce that employees do so? They can't unless there is a camera in the bathroom.
What he was trying to say is that the free market will typically run these poorly run places out business. You don't need a government regulation requiring a restaurant post some stupid sign saying employees must wash hands after using the restroom. That is common sense.
originally posted by: NotMoose
Read the article, SEN. Tillis actually has a good point. The public would/should be responsible for regulating the vendors (if the customer does not like a vendors practices then they choose not to be that vendors customer).
originally posted by: NotMoose
originally posted by: EyesOpenMouthShut
Wait, what?
This is a joke right?
Please tell me this is a joke...
Read the article, SEN. Tillis actually has a good point. The public would/should be responsible for regulating the vendors (if the customer does not like a vendors practices then they choose not to be that vendors customer).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“I think it’s one I can illustrate the point,” Tillis told the women. “I said, I don’t have any problem with Starbucks if they choose to opt out of this policy as long as the post a sign that says ‘We don’t require our employees to wash their hands after leaving the restrooms.’ The market will take care of that.”
“That’s probably one where every business that did that would go out of business,” he added. “But I think it’s good to illustrate the point that that’s the sort of mentality that we need to have to reduce the regulatory burden on this country.”
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: EyesOpenMouthShut
Wait, what?
This is a joke right?
Please tell me this is a joke...
It's not a joke but it's a clear case of Sen. Tillis letting his ideology get in the way of his common sense.
No way in hell he can ever live this dumbass remark down. I wonder what his new nickname will be? lol
originally posted by: Flatfish
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: EyesOpenMouthShut
Wait, what?
This is a joke right?
Please tell me this is a joke...
It's not a joke but it's a clear case of Sen. Tillis letting his ideology get in the way of his common sense.
No way in hell he can ever live this dumbass remark down. I wonder what his new nickname will be? lol
How about "The Ecoli Kid?"
About now, I'll just bet that all of his previous dinner guest are wondering what they were fed at his house.
I wonder how long it would take for this guy to propose expanding this type of insane de-regulation to include hospital operating rooms?
They too, could just post a sign saying; "We do not require surgeons to wash their hands prior to performing your operation."
What an absolute idiot!!