It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
As scientists looked at data coming from various telescopes which showed that all matter appears to be expanding away from each other, they surmised that if this is the case, then by reversing this motion they can establish that it appears all galaxies and cosmic formations came from a central point.
But the thing you have to keep in mind is that Inflation (AKA The Big Bang) is still only a theory. It has some evidence to back it up, of course, but it's still a theory and subject to change. Such as the change from "Big Bang" to "Inflation". They previously thought it was a massive explosion, which wasn't the case at all, but rather all matter simply "inflating" from a central point.
Whether you choose to put emotional stock on the theory is of course, up to the individual. That's the wonderful thing about science. If something came along tomorrow that disproves the big bang or inflation unequivocally, then scientists will go "Well, guess we were wrong about that!"
Yup, some scientists speculate that our Universe could hundreds of billions of years old and we'd never have any way to know it, because our observational bubble of the universe is limited by the speed of light.
originally posted by: Jamie1
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
As scientists looked at data coming from various telescopes which showed that all matter appears to be expanding away from each other, they surmised that if this is the case, then by reversing this motion they can establish that it appears all galaxies and cosmic formations came from a central point.
But the thing you have to keep in mind is that Inflation (AKA The Big Bang) is still only a theory. It has some evidence to back it up, of course, but it's still a theory and subject to change. Such as the change from "Big Bang" to "Inflation". They previously thought it was a massive explosion, which wasn't the case at all, but rather all matter simply "inflating" from a central point.
Whether you choose to put emotional stock on the theory is of course, up to the individual. That's the wonderful thing about science. If something came along tomorrow that disproves the big bang or inflation unequivocally, then scientists will go "Well, guess we were wrong about that!"
The other data is that science can estimate WHEN it happened. I can't speak for the accuracy of the measurement, but the claims are that the universe is 13.8 billion years old.
Now here's a problem with that...
What if something else pre-dated the big bang, but happened 14 billion light years away in the opposite direction?
We couldn't even observe it because the light energy from that event hasn't reached us.
There are MANY observational limitations and assumptions. All we can say is the things we can measure are consistent with them all originating from the same spot 13.8 billion years ago. It could be that our universe is nothing but a fart from a 100 billion year old giant. Who knows?
Totally off topic but I absolutely adore minute physics. I want to have internet babies with Minute Physics.
originally posted by: InfinityandBeyond
Minute Physics is a channel on YouTube that produce fairly short (average 5 minutes or so) videos that quickly detail many different subjects concerning physics. Very fun to watch.
To be fair, in the enormous size and scope of the universe, we humans don't even register as specks in the grand scheme of things. All the wars we fight, all the strife we experience, all the joy shared by us, every single thought and action we have produced have to date, have had about as much impact on the universe as the shifting of an individual electron within your body.
originally posted by: superman2012
I don't like the way you two are talking. It is making me feel rather insignificant! lol
originally posted by: Eunuchorn
Despite the sardonic title, I have a legitimate question.
What exactly is considered proof of the Big Bang happening? I have enough trouble believing anything provided to us by scientific sources as it is, but determining "The Big Bang" happened doesn't seem like something actually doable.
Any satellite/telescope nerds think they have the answer?
Wollack, E. J. (10 December 2010). "Cosmology: The Study of the Universe". Universe 101: Big Bang Theory. NASA. Archived from the original on 14 May 2011. Retrieved 27 April 2011. The second section discusses the classic tests of the Big Bang theory that make it so compelling as the likely valid description of our universe.
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Eunuchorn
As far as I'm aware there is no proof but there is evidence , the fact that Galaxies are moving away from each other is part of that evidence.