It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Shepard64
a reply to: Kuroodo
Oh and I am curious about the whole "world would be uninhabitable if nukes went off" Hiroshima is very habitable and it has been for years. Is it just because it was only one? Is the nuclear winter scenario talked up? I genuinely want to know, I am not being a douche lol
originally posted by: Kuroodo
I always see people referring to Nukes when it comes to World War 3. But they way I see it, it's stupid. Fire 1 nuke and you'll have a tsunami of nukes flying back at you. Then it causes a tidal wave of nukes all over the world. In the end you don't win. So why would any nation Threaten or warn of Nuclear weapons? In the end nobody wins. Also it's a stupid threat because the other nation is prepared with their own nukes... Shoot me and I shoot back.
originally posted by: Dabrazzo
a reply to: intrptr
No, not many did, seeing right wing ultra nationalists sacking your government and turning on the people, well, Im not entirely surprised.
From a Russian pair of shoes NATO really is pushing it too far regarding Ukraine.
originally posted by: phinubian
I do not see any greater advances where they can really back up what they boast about, they would not want war with the U.S. or it's allies, not happening, ...
originally posted by: noeltrotsky
originally posted by: phinubian
I do not see any greater advances where they can really back up what they boast about, they would not want war with the U.S. or it's allies, not happening, ...
Russia has well over 2,000 tactical nukes, US has 500. Russian tacticals have bigger top end yields as well. Given the massive size of Russia and the long roads to get to Moscow you would have to avoid a lot of small nukes to take over the place. Believe me they would nuke their own land to take out your brigade.
www.armscontrol.org...
The fantasy that the US is going to attack Russia is just that - a fantasy.
April 3, 2014
Deployment Extension of US Warships in Black Sea Exceeds International Terms – Lavrov
MOSCOW: Moscow has taken note that the extension of US warships deployed in the Black Sea has exceeded the set terms laid out in the international convention, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said during a joint press conference with Kazakhstan’s foreign minister on Thursday in Moscow.
“There exists the Montreux Convention, which gives extremely clear criteria limiting the deployment of warships not belonging to the Black Sea governments in regard to tonnage and length of stay,” Lavrov said.
“We have noticed that US warships have extended their deployment beyond the set terms a couple of times lately, and at times they did not always comply with the regulations that are set within the Montreux Convention.”
The USS Truxton, which is conducting prolonged military exercises in the Black Sea with the navies of Bulgaria and Romania, has overstayed its maximum 21 day period allowed for non-Black Sea State’s naval vessels under the Montreux Convention.
The Donald Cook is reported to be joining the Truxton, rather than substituting it. Should the Truxton not leave, latest at the arrival of the Donald Cook, the US will not only continue violating the Montreux Convention, but also increase its naval footprint in the Black Sea amidst the crisis.
nsnbc.me...
Actually the biggest threat to Russia's existence is Putin, all of the reasons they are in this situation right now point right to him, not the West, it's sad for anyone to even believe this propaganda.
Don't bitch about the US and its violations if your going to do the very same and I certainly would not expect compliance.
The fact remains Turkey is the one responsible for what happens if the treaty is violated