It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It was featured by The Economist as one of the most strangely drawn and gerrymandered congressional districts in the country and has been nicknamed "earmuffs" due to its shape. It was created to contain two majority Hispanic parts of Chicago. It was created to contain two majority Hispanic parts of Chicago.
This district covers two strips running east-west across the city of Chicago, Illinois on the west side continuing into smaller portions of some suburban areas in Cook County, surrounding Illinois' 7th congressional district. The northern portion is largely Puerto Rican, while the southern portion is heavily Mexican. The two sections are on opposite sides of the city and are only connected by a piece of Interstate 294 to the west; the highway is in the district while the surrounding areas are not.
We've been following the ways that politicians and special interests try to influence the redistricting process for their own gain, often at the expense of voters. An article this week in The New Yorker suggests that President Barack Obama's own political rise in Chicago was partially the result of gerrymandering. As The New Yorker's Ryan Lizza reported, Obama worked with a Democratic redistricting consultant to draw a state senate district tailored for him. Lizza wrote about the incident four years ago, detailing how Obama had learned the hard way that a University of Chicago academic was not necessarily someone whom all of Chicago's African-American voters would trust. In 1999, Obama suffered a serious defeat when he tried to take on longtime South Side Congressman Bobby Rush, who represents a district that is more than 62 percent African-American. Two years later, with the Democrats in control of Illinois redistricting, Obama was apparently able to reshape his state senate district to his own specifications, which included drawing in wealthy supporters from Chicago's Gold Coast.
Late in 1788, just after Virginia voted to ratify the Constitution and join the union, former Governor Patrick Henry persuaded the state legislature to remake the 5th Congressional District, forcing Henry’s political enemy James Madison to run against the formidable James Monroe.
...
In 1889, the Dakota Territory entered the union as two states, North and South Dakota. The move was orchestrated by the Republican Party, then in control of Congress, to promote the admission of more states in territories leaning toward the party. By the rules for representation in the Electoral College, each state carried at least three electoral votes regardless of its population, meaning Republicans could dramatically increase their presidential chances by letting in the greatest number of GOP-leaning states.
...
Tom Delay played a crucial role in Texas’s contentious 2003 redistricting process and helped ensure Republican dominance in his home state.
As correctly pointed out by Nate Silver, members of Congress are increasingly insulated by the increasing polarization of their districts. Ever-larger victory margins reflect ever-safer re-election races.
However, Silver has also restated a common belief. He states that partisan gerrymandering is a symmetric problem, i.e. both Democrats and Republicans do it. Although both sides are potentially motivated, only one side has taken redistricting to extremes. Recent changes in partisan gerrymandering constitute one of the major crises facing our system of government.
D%vote R%vote D seats R seats
Entire House 50.4% 49.6% 201 234
Arizona 45.6% 54.4% 5 4
Michigan 52.7% 47.3% 5 9
North Carolina 50.9% 49.1% 4 9
Pennsylvania 50.7% 49.3% 5 13
Wisconsin 50.8% 49.2% 3 5
In these five states – and in the nation as a whole – the partisan interests of voters are not being represented fairly.
In addition to North Carolina, Republicans drew district boundaries in Louisiana, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Alabama. Democrats drew districts in West Virginia and Illinois, in addition to Maryland. Boundaries in Kentucky were drawn up by that state's mixed legislature.
Again, the payoff for Republicans is in the makeup of the state's delegations: In those six states, Republicans picked up about 11 more seats than you'd expect from simply looking at the parties' vote shares.
originally posted by: Battleline
Your witnessing the take over of a country by people that destroyed there own country. The argument of " there refugees" is BS, it has always been that way, there are billions of refugee's all over the world, do we take them all in or just the convenient ones on the boarder.
They say there here for the American dream but want to change it to the very same way that destroyed there country.
What's even worse is the majority of people standing by while a rogue POTUS allows this to happen for no other reason then build the Dem base.
The gerrymandering is just another way to meet the agenda of control.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: xuenchen
So, are you saying that it's okay for Republicans to gerrymander the heck out of "urban" districts just to disempower Democratic voters? Because they're Democrats each of their sacredly important votes shouldn't count the same?
Do I have this correct?
originally posted by: Logarock
Look at this. Said to be the most extreme example of gerrymandering in the country. Naturally it favors the democrats and displays a clear race manipulation towards its ends.
Whats more is that the recent victory of Dem Luis Gutiérrez over Republican challenger Hector Concepcion demonstrates the left leaning preference of Hispanic voters. Gutierrez crushed Concepcion capturing 78% to 21% of the votes in this concentrated Hispanic district. A fact that clearly proves up the validity of conservative voices who warn that the presidents immigration machination are geared toward replicating this sort of result...
Just several more districts created like this could and would give the democrats an advantage based on the parties popularity among Hispanic voters. Several million well placed illegals given amnesty, and they may already be in place, would be a real results demonstrable goal for the democrats.
originally posted by: Battleline
Your witnessing the take over of a country by people that destroyed there own country. The argument of " there refugees" is BS, it has always been that way, there are billions of refugee's all over the world, do we take them all in or just the convenient ones on the boarder.
They say there here for the American dream but want to change it to the very same way that destroyed there country.
What's even worse is the majority of people standing by while a rogue POTUS allows this to happen for no other reason then build the Dem base.
The gerrymandering is just another way to meet the agenda of control.
A fact that clearly proves up the validity of conservative voices who warn that the presidents immigration machination are geared toward replicating this sort of result.