a reply to:
tavi45
If I may try to explain the difference from my perspective
The difference I see is the man who got arrested 'claimed' his ex-wife had gotten back from Africa and had Ebola, a contagious deadly disease
Out of precautions, until they could verify what the guy claimed to be true or false, the casino shut down until all was clear
Once they found out it was all made up and no one's health was at stake, they opened up
This case was an actual 'physical' situation that could have had the potential to be serious if he had been telling the truth
Now then, the story in your link....
That was a distasteful thing to do but no one was claiming to be near someone with Ebola, therefore it could not harm anybody
Tacky, yes
Uncalled for, yes
But IMO, 2 different situations all together
One
physically affected people near him and could have infected many if the story proved to be true, hence why the casino shut down until
further notice, to be on the safe side
The other was about objects [towels] with words on them that many thought offensive, but were harmless none the less
What the man did in the casino was clearly in the wrong and people had reason to be concerned about their health
The other was a distasteful act to get at their opponents, but with no actual health risk
--Possible health risk scare [casino guy]
--Harmless towels with offensive writing