Sixty Days To Beat Ebola, United Nations Warns

The Russians may have a vaccine ready sooner than years into the future,they are working on three vaccines,according to the Russian Ministry of Health,so let's hope that comes through.I cannot provide a link,as RT is verboten,and the Moscow Time article is not up to date -it's from August,while the RT source is from the 12th October.But you can google it.Let's just hope it works.sa reply to: j.r.c.b.

a reply to: Raxoxane

No need for a vaccine, it isn't really ebola. Probably just "fermoldehyde". I just read it here on ATS.

It seems though they could stop it with the 79k person supply of ZMAPP but don't seem to care about that for some reason and say it can't be made fast enough, yet they had other stories saying they had that much already stockpiled....then all of a sudden vaccine stories floated to the top of the headlines, troops were sent to West Africa(maybe for enforcement of vaccination campaign and practice) and now an American health care worker comes down with it, well, guess we'll have to try our "first" vaccination trial...only we forgot to tell you people that we already tried to vaccinate people in 2006-2009 and will not let anyone see the results, hello CBS, NBC, CNN and FOX where are you? Anybody home?

a reply to: Unity_99

You know, when the deaths from ebola in West Africa started to take a low turn in the first week of October, you know what the WHO did?, they blame it on poor track of new cases from the health care workers.

What that tells you.

a reply to: j.r.c.b.

If it continues at its current rate, we have one and a half years at most before extinction.
bad,, very very bad

originally posted by: Argyll
a reply to: babybunnies

When they say 10,000 people a week, but then also say 1.4 million in three months, the math doesn't add up.

It does.....because the increase would be exponential, it wouldn't be 10,000 cases per week every week for 3 months, it could double every week for 3 months and easily top 1.4 million.

scary times indeed.

This would seem to be a good time to put up Professor Albert Bartlett's 5 million view YT video on 'The Exponential Function', what he called mankind's biggest failure to understand... below is a link to the transcript if you'd rather read it.


Albert Bartlett transcript

How EXACTLY do they plan on doing that? They still haven't found a cure for cancer, but miraculously, they're gonna find a cure, within the next 2 months, to cure one of the world's most deadliest viruses? Is this the crap we're supposed to believe???

No one seems to be paying attention to the laws that are being passed because of the Ebola hype.

Can you really blame the elite, for wanting to reduce the population???????

originally posted by: ImDaMan
How EXACTLY do they plan on doing that? They still haven't found a cure for cancer, but miraculously, they're gonna find a cure, within the next 2 months, to cure one of the world's most deadliest viruses? Is this the crap we're supposed to believe???

No one seems to be paying attention to the laws that are being passed because of the Ebola hype.

Can you really blame the elite, for wanting to reduce the population???????

Almost anything is easier to cure than cancer.. Viruses have antigens.. Certain proteins.. Antibodies are the cure..
Cancer is YOU... Hard to cure and separate you from you. Cancer is not ONE "disease." They're all different.

the deadliness of Ebola means little for finding a cure. Of course cure is a weird word to use to explain a vaccine.
I've looked into some of the research. It's really down to testing as the route of what is needed is already mapped out.

a reply to: NoAngel2u

With a at most, a 70% mortality rate, how would it manage excitation, in the very very rare chance it actually managed to infect everyone on the planet?

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: Unity_99

You know, when the deaths from ebola in West Africa started to take a low turn in the first week of October, you know what the WHO did?, they blame it on poor track of new cases from the health care workers.

What that tells you.

What that tells me is someone is using honest to goodness logic. As time ticks by the cases in these hard hit areas are going to drop because the people doing the counting will not be able to keep up. Burials will happen right away in mass unmarked graves.


People are always searching for conspiracies even when it goes against logic and common sense.

Ah good old Sky News, they sneak the story out at just after midnight and waking up this morning no trace of it on the front page when everyone's actually up and looking in the UK. The old 'we did tell you - while you were asleep'.

Not the first time I've seen these tactics.... Good way to make sure that it's in the public record but no one notices.

Ironically if you then click on 'World' headlines still no mention - apart from where it's the number one article on 'Trending'.

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: nerdyclutzyblonde

Yes, you are right is very scary, but not because ebola that is nothing but scaremongering, the danger is more deeper than that, in order to stop contagions in ebola ridden countries, the UN, WHO and big private pharma interest will be pushing untested in human vaccines.

That is what you should be scare about, a mass forced vaccinations within the next 60 days.

So what would you do, have a vaccine test that gave half a population a placebo knowing that if they catch Ebola 70% would die. Do we wait several months until multiple double blind tests have been done whilst burying hundreds of thousands who could have been saved? There is a balance to be made between the required urgency due to the nature of the disease and how fast it is spreading versus the need to confirm effectiveness and complications.

Of course we are all really safe because vaccines are not needed some natural berry juice grown on the bible thumping farm is all the protection we need.

a reply to: ValentineWiggin

The Average Joe definately knows that stopping flights from affected areas would prevent the spread but the Authorities don't give fck.

originally posted by: Unity_99
Before you buy into their goals think, stand still and think deeply. There is a thread with an article from Western Africa about the diamond strikes and also there's oil there. And 4000 troops were sent in to "shoot the virus" apparently. There are also reports of hundreds of well poisonings with fermoldehyde which mimics some of these symptoms. Who makes the money and what is the gain? Is this really ebola? I don't buy it for one minute.

Unity, I hope you don't catch it, because it is a nasty nasty virus... And it really can kill if left alone.

But to address something you said, because it's probably the most off the wall statement I've ever heard in my life, and I dunno if it's you that came up with it or an article, but man, it's really gods awful wrong.. Troops cannot "shoot" the virus. The military people that were sent in were sent in to assist in diagnosis and treatment, as well as quarantine.

To everyone else:

They cannot do a mass forced vaccination for Ebola, there IS NO VACCINE for it, and not one on the horizon for a few more years.. Ebola Zaire has been known of for a while, like the other 4 strains, but they didn't feel it was a threat at this time, unfortunately the current situation changes that. Nut again, there is NO VACCINE that they could force everyone to take, right now everything is post-virus not pre-virus.. so there are no preventative anti-viral vaccines to be had.. so I don't think you're going to have mass vaccination scares anytime soon, which brings up another point though.. The statistics of older diseases resurgent due to everyone that is fear mongering over getting shots..

Sometimes a cow is just that, a cow. Nothing special about it except that the cow has taken on a life of it's own and everyone has to be made afraid of it.. Vaccines are that cow, without some of them we would be in a lot worse shape now.. but on this one.. there's no vaccine to take...

Back to Unity: you do realize that diamonds are essentially worthless, only DeBeers controls the fact that people "want" them and the price of them, otherwise they are among one of the most abundant gem's on the planet, as people have been figuring that out, Diamonds no longer have the allure they once had..

56 days...