It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: darkbake
a reply to: Painterz
I was thinking it would force the issue as well. Although I'm not sure if Ukraine would get NATO membership right away, and there seems to be a lot of paperwork keeping the U.S. and its allies from aiding Ukraine at the moment. But maybe that would change if Ukraine was a member of NATO.
The seed of hatred is planted, and it will escalated, I can guarantee you that…
originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: Flatcoat
And only one side has been shelling it's own civilians.
And only one side has been sending troops into a sovereign country and annexing part of that sovereign country.
Have you noticed they only shell where the separatists are hiding behind human shields?
. Evidence points to Russia having invaded with both paratroopers and possibly an unknown number of troops hiding under the guise of unofficial uniforms. Russian artillery has been caught firing across the border on Ukrainian soldiers, and no one knows who shot down MH-17.
with both paratroopers and possibly an unknown number of troops hiding under the guise of unofficial uniforms
no one knows who shot down MH-17.
originally posted by: yuppa
I say make a exception and make them a NATO member(on a trial basis) where in they have 1 year to get the situation under control with the assistence of NATO. That skirts around the admittance rules. Because they cannot control their borders without assitance currently.Due to outside interferrence.
Also is it just me or are the serbians upset still about getting trounced for ethnic cleansing?
Also is it just me or are the serbians upset still about getting trounced for ethnic cleansing?
getting trounced for ethnic cleansing?