Al Qaeda's next target? Europe? But I....

Ed,

With the recent headline about the PsyOps using disinformation in Iraq to aid the US, do you think it is possible the same is being used in Europe to try and persuade backing for more US action?

The US really does need as much support as it can get at the moment, do you think this idea is a reality?

Not saying I think this is true, but could it be a possibility?

Bin Laden enemies are not just in a few countries. Basically anyone that does not follow his extremist view of Islam is a potential target, even more moderate muslims in the middle east. So it would be no surprise that he would target europe. In fact he already has in the past.

[edit on 6-12-2004 by Trent]

That we were agains the Iraq war makes us the prime target for muslim terrorists. For those who don't know: Saddam and Al Quaida did not like each other so very well. Saddam was of course against a system as you could find in Afghanistan or can find in Iran. So he was AQ's enemy.

If you complain we do not help in iraq:
www.bundesregierung.de...

Cutting people's rights and screening the population does not work. We learned that when we fought the RAF.So we are not more vulnerable than the US because we are more free.

As for deporting all Muslims.. Hello.. welcome to the 21st century. Not every muslim is a terrorist and not every terrorist is muslim. Most muslims are perfectly integrated european citizens.

Of course you can blame the US for Terrorism. You can also blame us as well. The reason we fight them is not that they hate us blindly without any reason. WE misstreated them and so it is our fault that they dislike us.


[edit on 6/12/04 by tsuribito]

You know, I get a kick out of a lot of the Bush haters. They say he's a moron, yet he masterminded this huge scheme with 9/11, and the Iraq war. Which is it? Is Bush a moron, or an evil genius?

Originally posted by edsinger
No actually is was called capitulation, the Madrid attacks made the people so scared that they wanted the socialists in, and not the US ally, they wanted to distance themselves from the united states and thats what they did, democratically yes but the results are the same.....

Wouldn't hurt if you brush up on the situation leading to the impeachement of the Spanish goverment and what actualy happened.

Due to the goverment in charge at that time not listening to the people, that goverment was already being ousted.
The bombings just sped this up from being next months event to being todays event.

The bombings were just the drop that overflowed the bucket faster then expected, with a goverment term of bad policy's, neglecting the people's voted goverment plans and a whole flury of other things the spanish goverment did wrong in the eyes of the people before the bombings.

Originally posted by Thinker

Hilter burned the government building
Bush blew up the pentagon.

America allowed japan to attack pearl harbour in order to enter the war.
America allowed the jihadist to attack the two towers in order shift american forces into the middleast.

[edit on 5-12-2004 by Thinker]

So Bush attacked the Pentagon and the Islamics attacked the twin Towers?




This is kinda funny when you think about it.....

Originally posted by Jaruseleh
You know, I get a kick out of a lot of the Bush haters. They say he's a moron, yet he masterminded this huge scheme with 9/11, and the Iraq war. Which is it? Is Bush a moron, or an evil genius?

it wasnt bush behind this...bush is only a puppet on a string

Originally posted by edsinger

Originally posted by Thinker

Hilter burned the government building
Bush blew up the pentagon.

America allowed japan to attack pearl harbour in order to enter the war.
America allowed the jihadist to attack the two towers in order shift american forces into the middleast.

[edit on 5-12-2004 by Thinker]

they arranged both...pretty scary hah!?

So Bush attacked the Pentagon and the Islamics attacked the twin Towers?

This is kinda funny when you think about it.....

Originally posted by edsinger
Reading this article has me puzzled. Why would Al Qaeda attack Europe?

Because they seek toundermine liberal democratic structures and force a global war that they figure they will come out on top of, at least in the middle east. Becaue Europeans are just as decadent, hypocritical, and arrogant to them as Americans. Heck, the US was involved in iran and supported the jihadis in afghanistan, but its the europeans who really mucked with the country and destroyed islamic power and prestige by destryoing the Ottoman Empire. Besides, lots of european countries are involved in that region now, -and-, since countries like spain have proven to be capable of being influenced by terrorism, why wouldn't they try it out on other countries?

Also, don't forget that some islamic groups lay claim to spain itself. More realistically, al qaida recruits and probably trains albanian muslims in the balkans where there is a very active struggle. Heck, if they can support chechnyans against the russians, why not work to support the albanians and bosnians? Or the muslim revolutionaries in western china? Or the muslims in kashmir? Or muslims in indonesia? They have a global base to act on.

Originally posted by Corinthas
A small hint: get out of Saudi Arabia and Bin-Ladin might leave you alone.

Eff 'im. How about the US stays in saudi arabia and kills 'im? How about beating him instead of giving up?

After wondering where Al-Queada will strike next... what poor defenceless country will the US terrorize next?

Duh, iran.

If there is an attack in europe its gonna be Rome i think.

If my intuition is correct and the NWO is behind the sceme they have tactically chosen their target.

-not the UK ofcourse because they are the biggest allies
-not any of the countries that didnt support the war because that is illogical if u wanna blame the muslim terrorists

so what remains are the countries that supported(some militairally) the war.

Albania >not a likeley candidate,not important enough
Poland > too much near russia
Danmark > too small
Netherlands>probably not
Spain >already happend
Turkey >Not europe really,is a muslim country
Italy@@@@>This is the one perfect for the sceme,the likely city of choice is ROME

reasons: 1)the world would be in rage when the vatican gets blown up, catholics in whole the world will support bush in his crusade against the muslim states(where most of the oil is ofcourse)
2)Europe will give complete support after this horrable attack on european soil and join the americans in their crusade
3)America will have absolute enforcing power in the world

Their will also attacks needed on American cities to gain absolute power in America itself to make itself a complete war state while having the support of the people and their willingness to except less freedom in all kind of areas and use warpropaganda to its fullest effect.

Originally posted by Kriz_4
Ed,

With the recent headline about the PsyOps using disinformation in Iraq to aid the US, do you think it is possible the same is being used in Europe to try and persuade backing for more US action?

The US really does need as much support as it can get at the moment, do you think this idea is a reality?

Not saying I think this is true, but could it be a possibility?

Not in this case no imho. Europe has made their stand..........

Originally posted by Jaruseleh
You know, I get a kick out of a lot of the Bush haters. They say he's a moron, yet he masterminded this huge scheme with 9/11, and the Iraq war. Which is it? Is Bush a moron, or an evil genius?

And you actually believe this?

Micheal Moore would be so proud of you!

Originally posted by motionknight

Italy@@@@>This is the one perfect for the sceme,the likely city of choice is ROME

reasons: 1)the world would be in rage when the vatican gets blown up, catholics in whole the world will support bush in his crusade against the muslim states(where most of the oil is ofcourse)
2)Europe will give complete support after this horrable attack on european soil and join the americans in their crusade
3)America will have absolute enforcing power in the world

Although I do not buy it, it seems plausible...