It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
rustyclutch
reply to post by Spider879
Everyone knows they are coming for the guns. Only question is how long and whats the catalyst.
Happy1
reply to post by spurgeonatorsrevenge
I think bloomberg's "heaven" will be having to live in the deepest, darkest part of harlem with no way to defend himself -
I guess he'll be a victim of "gun-control" over and over and over again in his eternity.
He's an idiot.
olaru12
rustyclutch
reply to post by Spider879
Everyone knows they are coming for the guns. Only question is how long and whats the catalyst.
Before they come for our guns, wouldn't you think they would stop manufacture and sales first?
Do you really think they are going to shut down a 31.8 Billion dollar a year industry?
www.csmonitor.com...
Too many people, making too much money for them to ban or confiscate guns.
Get real!!
Opinion is a business. Multimillion dollar one, too. The debates will rage incessantly, a little will happen here or there then be repealed and more debate and more shaking the tin cup like a bum in $5000 suit.
liejunkie01
I just read the whole article. The last paragraph really caught my attention. Mainly this.
“I am telling you if there is a God, when I get to heaven I’m not stopping to be interviewed. I am heading straight in. I have earned my place in heaven. It’s not even close.”
This to me states exactly where his mindset is.
Underscoring his desire to work with both parties, Mr. Bloomberg is bringing on a new advisory board with prominent Republican and Democratic figures. Tom Ridge, the former Pennsylvania governor and Homeland Security secretary under President George W. Bush; Eli Broad, the philanthropist; Warren Buffett, the investor; and Michael G. Mullen, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under both Mr. Bush and President Obama, will all be board members.
Indeed, Mr. Bloomberg has already spent millions of dollars trying to persuade members of Congress to support enhanced background check laws with virtually nothing to show for it - See more at: www.abovetopsecret.com...
originally posted by: 200Plus
I am very pro-rights. I am all for background checks of the individual buying a firearm. I am 100% against a national registry.
Bloomberg wants an enhanced background check. Which would incorporate even more personal information into the current check required to purchase a firearm.
The check includes:
Buyers name
Buyers SSN
Buyers Address
Weapon Model
Weapon Make
Weapon Caliber
Weapon Capacity
That information does not make the public safer. It makes the gun owner more at risk from seizure. It is a national firearms registry. All that should be needed is a buyers name and SSN. A call should be made and the buyer cleared to purchase a firearm. No record should be kept as a "shopping list" on confiscation day.
That is my opinion as a pro-rights person.