It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
doubletap
reply to post by Gryphon66
They could always take their little hurt feelings to another bakery like a mature adult would do.
Instead , they choose to whine and sue.
doubletap
reply to post by SearchLightsInc
I despise religion and this bill protects the rights of business owners. You seem to think they shouldn't have rights.
Why is that? Childish ignorance, or no respect for rights for people who have opinions you don't like?
Benevolent Heretic
I would be really careful about that, because if another person enters your establishment and you sell to them, you've got a possible lawsuit on your hands.
Bone75
Gryphon66
Bone75
No, the a**hole is the gay person who turns to their mate and says "Let's go make that Christian bake us a wedding cake." or "Let's go make that Christian take our wedding photos."
IN this scenario, did the gay folk poll bakers just to find out which ones were Christian?
Yep, sounds reasonable. (Not.)
More reasonable than thinking a business owner is going to start polling customers to find out which ones are sinners, especially in small towns where everyone knows each other.edit on b20144America/Chicago75 by Bone75 because: (no reason given)
doubletap
reply to post by mOjOm
A business owner has the right to refuse service. Evidently that concept is lost on you.
There is no right to force someone to do business with you. Baked goods are not a civil right.edit on 4-4-2014 by doubletap because: (no reason given)
The Federal Civil Rights Act guarantees all people the right to "full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin." The right of public accommodation is also guaranteed to disabled citizens under the Americans with Disabilities Act, which precludes discrimination by businesses on the basis of disability.
In cases in which the patron is not a member of a federally protected class, the question generally turns on whether the business's refusal of service was arbitrary, or whether the business had a specific interest in refusing service.
Like many issues involving constitutional law, the law against discrimination in public accommodations is in a constant state of change. Some argue that anti-discrimination laws in matters of public accommodations create a conflict between the ideal of equality and individual rights. Does the guaranteed right to public access mean the business owner's private right to exclude is violated? For the most part, courts have decided that the constitutional interest in providing equal access to public accommodations outweighs the individual liberties involved.
doubletap
reply to post by mOjOm
A business owner has the right to refuse service. Evidently that concept is lost on you.
There is no right to force someone to do business with you. Baked goods are not a civil right.edit on 4-4-2014 by doubletap because: (no reason given)
doubletap
reply to post by SearchLightsInc
Business owners still maintain property rights and the freedom of association. They are free to associate or in this case, not associate with whoever they want for whatever reason they choose.
Gay bakers can deny service to anyone wearing a cross if they choose to.
doubletap
Business owners still maintain property rights and the freedom of association. They are free to associate or in this case, not associate with whoever they want for whatever reason they choose.
Gay bakers can deny service to anyone wearing a cross if they choose to.
doubletap
reply to post by mOjOm
All their little ridiculous court findings do is make business owners come up with more subtle ways to discriminate and there is nothing the courts can do about it
doubletap
reply to post by SearchLightsInc
Absolutely. Its your business and you are free to turn down revenue and run your business in a stupid manner, because its your property, your capital, and your risk.
It would also open up an opportunity for someone to open a competing bakery that specializes in cakes for gay weddings and interracial couples.
doubletap
reply to post by SearchLightsInc
Yes, they maintain that right. Government has passed unconstitutional laws opening business owners up to liability if they deny a laughable protected class, so other methods are used.
Black person wants a job? Sorry, position was just filled.
Want a cake for a gay wedding? Sorry, too many orders , your gay cake wouldn't be done on time.
There are always ways around unconstitutional laws
Bone75
Gryphon66
Bone75
No, the a**hole is the gay person who turns to their mate and says "Let's go make that Christian bake us a wedding cake." or "Let's go make that Christian take our wedding photos."
IN this scenario, did the gay folk poll bakers just to find out which ones were Christian?
Yep, sounds reasonable. (Not.)
More reasonable than thinking a business owner is going to start polling customers to find out which ones are sinners, especially in small towns where everyone knows each other.edit on b20144America/Chicago75 by Bone75 because: (no reason given)