It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You know, saying "this is impossible, this is fact" doesn't actually mean it is. I'd be interested to see where you're getting that from. For some reason, a man sitting on a lakeshore and holding a banana comes to mind.
Next up, genetic evidence is the strongest evidence of evolution we have. It does not counter the theory of evolution, it bolsters it far beyond anything Darwin could have dreamed. If we could timetravel the dude to the modern day and show him what we know now, he would die in the throes of a joygasm.
Originally posted by IrnBruFiend
Tiny little spiders, frogs and geckos that were not known to us previously is not an example of evolution.
The answer is, there is no evidence.
Firstly how does evolution explain things changing from reproducing asexually to reproducing sexually...what did the first thing that reproduced sexually mate with..
how did it come about that various species give birth in different ways..inside the body, outside the body
the first human-esque creature, did it have an umbilical cord, if not how did the offspring get the nutrient rich blood
Where? Tiny little spiders, frogs and geckos that were not known to us previously is not an example of evolution. The answer is, there is no evidence.
I certainly could believe in a God, any God really, should any evidence ever be produce for such an entity. As since no evidence has been brought forth for any deity, I find it hard to blindly believe in one out of thousands.
Originally posted by OhZone
Maslo, they are still flies aren't they.
Now if you will show me where they turn into ants or spiders you will have a convincing case.
Originally posted by alpha-erectus
A question for followers of organised religion.
Why are you all so ignorant?
Originally posted by IrnBruFiend
reply to post by DaMod
You are absolutely correct on evolution.
We will never see one single animal evolve.
Originally posted by IrnBruFiend
DNA evidence proves this, you just won't be a mainstream scientist.
You'll get a wishy washy response to that because there is and never will be evidence to corroborate with Darwin's theory.
Originally posted by DaMod
reply to post by OhZone
Evolution and natural selection select traits that are essential (or not so) for the continued survival of the species, sometimes creating a new species.
Originally posted by DaMod
What we did with dogs is change their outer appearance through selective breeding. We basically accomplished a version of what we see in nature.
Originally posted by DaMod
Yes they can still interbreed but so can different species in nature.
Originally posted by Behaviour???
Firstly how does evolution explain things changing from reproducing asexually to reproducing sexually...what did the first thing that reproduced sexually mate with..
It was in gradual point of time that Darwin and Mendel recoginised that germcells seperated and that they put forth the law of segregation and independent assortment to understand more about the transform of asexual reproduction to the sexual one.
Originally posted by Behaviour???
You are aware of the fact that we have infact evolved from apes.
Originally posted by Behaviour???
the growth of the umbilical chord was gradual and thet still then we had the same mechanics as that of an ape
Originally posted by Behaviour???
Where? Tiny little spiders, frogs and geckos that were not known to us previously is not an example of evolution. The answer is, there is no evidence.
Obviously there is.i will give you a small example
Two sub-population of beetles where separated by a large geographical feature like river or mountain.in the passage of time the gene flow was prevented becuse it was impossible for them to cross the mountain.So that in the passage of time they differentiated themselves giving rise to new adaptability capable sex organs.so if the other group of beetles meet also they cant mate because they may have chromosome change and many other factors hindering mating giving rise to a new species.
Genetics is a vast subject
Thanks
B???
Originally posted by Maslo
Originally posted by OhZone
Maslo, they are still flies aren't they.
Now if you will show me where they turn into ants or spiders you will have a convincing case.
The point is, they are a different species, unable to cross-reproduce and "synchronise", so its only a matter of time before they start to look different.. After reproductive isolation, its inevitable..
Originally posted by habfan1968
Originally posted by alpha-erectus
A question for followers of organised religion.
Why are you all so ignorant?
Where is that coming from? No mention of religion by the OP and you spew that off? Guess who looks like the ignorant?
Originally posted by davesidious
reply to post by OhZone
It would help you to know what the theory of evolution states before launching into a tirade against it, showing everyone just how little you know.
Just a hint.
The point is, they are still, ants or spiders.