Im not sure where this is most appropriately placed but this forum seemed to be the most likely and it will apply to the Philadelphia experiment among
possible other things. Also please take not i make several leaps of thought here and i am not stating this as factual opinion im more or less taking a
few scientific theories as i know them and posing a what if possibility.
I have been doing a little thinking and a little reading lately about some information that was given to me from a retired military officer. This
individual was at the time talking about technology that was in the government hands and it was being reverse engineered for the past 60 years.
Generally statements of that nature are quickly dismissed in my head as BS however for some reason some of what this individual said intrigued me. I
will not speculate as to the origins of this technology but as i said it was being reverse engineered so the US did not initially build it. Anyway
this gentleman told me of a device that was capable of transportation of huge distances in a blink of an eye. This device was capable of doing so by
moving two points in space closer together rather then actually traveling between the two points it literally brought the two points to the same
place. Kinda like bringing Moscow to Washington and bending what was between the two points. At first this was a bit hard to fathom or even understand
for that matter. However after thinking about it i finally grasped the idea and it seemed oddly enough it sounded strangely familiar.
Now before anyone screams BS hear me out on this, the device sounded familiar from two different places the first being Bob Lazar, the second being
some theories based upon Einstein's theories. Now according to Lazar a device exists that manipulates gravity in a way it warps space and time ,
according to Einstein's theories this is possible as it follows right along with his theories. A very basic low tech description of such a device
would be the sheet example. Picture taking a sheet and tieing its corners to four chairs then pulling those chairs apart so the sheet is tight, the
sheet at this point would represent space/time . Now label one corner of the sheet as point A and an opposing corner point B. Then take a bowling ball
and toss it in the center of the sheet, the bowling ball would represent an intense gravity field or an object with great mass. Obviously the sheet
would sag as a result of this great mass and point A and point B would be much closer together. All of the places between point A and point B would
still exist unharmed they would just be in a different location or plane momentarily. Lazar's information whether born from a real experience or
spawned from examining Einstein's works seems very plausible. Ill admit i made the example very simple but in a nutshell its like how our solar
system works, the sun is a great ball of mass that has pulled the planets in our solar system inwards and keeps them into a gravitational orbit around
Now taking Lazar's info further you have his mention of gravity actually being a wave like a radio wave which this does follow with a good
percentage of the scientific community also it seems to parallel Einstein again. Lazar makes mention of a gravity wave "A" and an a gravity wave
"B" which he states are two different waves and im not sure at this point if we still are following Einstein's theories or not as i haven't
researched that far. Gravity wave "B" is your common gravity that we are physically aware of , its the gravity that keeps us held to the ground and
makes objects heavy to lift. Gravity "A" is a gravity wave we are not physically aware of but its the gravity that keeps the atoms together to form
us and anything else together. Think of gravity "A" as being glue holding our atoms together so we dont fly apart and we remain a solid object. Now
i didnt read Lazar's books and the info ive read on the net doesn't seem to go very far into the whole gravity "A" gravity "B" thing. However if
im understanding this correctly if one where to manipulate the gravity "A" wave in such a fashion as to temporarily turn it off then the two solids
could pass through each other. Such as a humans hand could pass through a solid sheet of steel , it wouldn't really be passing through it but rather
occupying the same space as it at the same time. ( being one with it essentially ) Truth be known the further you go into an objects make up you find
vast amounts of empty space, look at a diagram of an atom and see how much of it is empty space, then take into the fact that their is space between
the atoms. ( kinda makes you wonder if it boils down to it are we just empty space and energy?)
According to Einstein's theories gravity has the ability to warp/twist/bend or pretty much do whatever it wants to do with light. A black hole is a
good example of this given it is said to be a gravitational pull so intense that not even light can escape it. The swirls you see in a black hole are
actually light that is being sucked into the hole and you can see how it twist the light into a funnel. To understand what im saying next you have to
understand how the basics of objects are visible or not visible. Objects are visible because light is bouncing off of them , if you go into a room
with no windows and turn off all forms of light then you see nothing because there is no light bouncing off of anything. Light bounces from a mass
then it is taken in by your eye and you are seeing the reflection which is what makes things visible. The same as radar or sonar a signal is sent out
then it hits something solid and bounces back giving the radar unit the objects form and location. Taking the above info on gravity wave type "A"
into consideration if one where to be able to turn gravity "A" off then your mass would not be held together and you essentially would not be a
solid. Without gravity "A" you would not have a surface for light to hit and bounce off of , are you still there? yes, but you would not be visible.
( again i may not be understanding this correctly ) Thereby by manipulating gravity "A" you could make an object invisible , as to what state you
would return to after turning gravity "A" back on who knows. Possibly the atomic make up of things follows the phenomena of "quantum entanglement"
and our make up is pre set to what its make up should be and the atoms would reform exactly as they should.
Now lets apply the above possibilities/theories/hypothesis/BS whatever you want to call it to the Philadelphia experiment. Now if this individual who
i spoke with is correct and such a device exists its functions seem to parallel Einstein's theories and some of what Bob Lazar has said. If such a
device existed obviously the US government would do everything in its power to test it and manipulate it in a matter to use it for military use. Those
of you saying not everything is about the military believe me nothing could be further from the truth, imagine a device that could deliver a tank to
the white house from Iraq instantly then back to Iraq in the same blink of an eye. The military uses of such a device would be endless and you would
never want the general public to have any form of this technology as it wouldn't be in the interest of national security. So lets go out on a limb
and say this device did/does exist and it was tested that day in 1943 on U.S.S. Eldridge and her crew. If such a device where tested without the exact
knowledge of how to use it its possible you could transport a ship from one point to another in a blink of an eye. Or if you only slightly bent
space/time between two points the ship would be required to use its own propulsion to get from point A to point B but you could do so in a much
quicker time given the two points are now closer together. This could explain the time lapse between where the ship was seen at one point then it all
the sudden was back at its original point. Then you have the whole the ship turned invisible statements this could be explained by gravity "A" being
manipulated in order to bend space/time as i stated above. Going further you have reports of crew members being fused into the ship this actually
would be easily explainable if the whole gravity "A" theory is correct. See with gravity "A" being off then your atoms if the theory is correct
would not be a solid you would have the ability to pass through objects and vice versus. Depending on your position when the gravity "A" wave was
returned to normal it would be conceivable you could literally be fused within a piece of the ship. For example for some reason you moved during this
wave off time frame not only you but everything within the area affected is in this non glue like state so the ships hull may or may not be in its
actual space and you might be in the space its supposed to occupy. Now say your arm was occupying the area that the ships hull was occupying then when
the wave was returned to normal both your arm and the ships hull would occupy the same space. Would your arm immediately be severed ?, possibly not
since both you and the ship had to return to there original form this would make me think that you and the metal would quite simply be constructed
together, meaning both your atomic mass and the metals atomic mass are occupying the same space. Your veins/muscles/bones/etc would still be there but
on an atomic level they would be combined with a piece of steel, how this would work is a question for physics and is outside my realm.
If such a device did/does exist and they tested it that day in 1943 then following theories of Einstein as well as others respected in the scientific
community and tossing in some of Lazars statements this all makes sense to me in a twisted way. It also has me questioning how we went from combustion
engines to individuals such as Einstein that came up with theories that are just now being proven had such knowledge to do come up with those theories
in the first place.
I also got to thinking about how you would get around the inertia of using such a device but then it occurred to me you are not moving the space/time
plane is so no inertia. There are so many tangents my mind could go off on .............however im not saying the above is a fact im just throwing
out the possibility whether or not you believe it thats up to you , additional any holes you see in my thoughts let me know.
here is a low key link of to explain some of Einstein's work if you didnt grasp some of the things i said.