It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

US To Sell Nuclear Fuel To Vietnam, Will Permit Uranium Enrichment

page: 2
8
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 25 2014 @ 03:57 PM
link   
reply to post by crazyewok
 





So? doesnt mean you had to send men to die in a war which out come had little diffrence on the American people.


Likewise.

England didn't have to screw up the middle east that someone else has been cleaning up for the last 60 years.

France didn't have to go to Vietnam in the first place.

Russia didn't have to fight their proxy war against the US in Vietnam.

Or China.

Considering England's history I wouldn't be so judge mental.
edit on 25-2-2014 by neo96 because: (no reason given)




posted on Feb, 25 2014 @ 04:02 PM
link   
reply to post by Bassago
 


Stupid, stupid, and more stupid.

Obama and his hypocritical ways... This doesn't make any sense at all. Failures and waste of money...

-SAP-



posted on Feb, 25 2014 @ 04:03 PM
link   

neo96
[
Likewise.

England didn't have to screw up the middle east that someone else has been cleaning up for the last 60 years.

Middle east was screwed up long before that. Anyway UK troops have been fighting and dyeing right beside US troops.

neo96
France didn't have to go to Vietnam in the first place.

Russia didn't have to fight their proxy war against the US in Vietnam.

Or China.

Nope 2 ,3 or even 4 wrongs dont make a right.

If the USA had kept out you would have saved 50,000 lives and have lost nothing.

Just because Frane et al went in doesnt mean the USA should have. Doesnt make you any better than them.

It like the saying "just cause your freinds jumped off a cliff doesnt men you should"

neo96
Considering England's history who the hell are you to lecture here.

WHO ?

1) Im not repsonisible for my countrys past actions (Nor are you)
2) Im not defending British past actions (But you are)
3)USA has been just as much up to its necks on crap as any european country. so who are you to leature me on the UK?
4) Freedom of speech
5) Intenational forum
6) Too annoy you thats why.
edit on 25-2-2014 by crazyewok because: (no reason given)

edit on 25-2-2014 by crazyewok because: (no reason given)

edit on 25-2-2014 by crazyewok because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 25 2014 @ 06:43 PM
link   
The U.S. obviously wants to surround China with nuclear weapons-Japan has been seeking them, and now this. It's just like during the Cold War when we put nukes in Europe. I would say that giving Vietnam nuclear anything is an extremely bad idea, unless the US puts advisers on hand to make sure the technology is handled properly. While the Vietnamese are bright, they have a shortage of competent people in the nuclear sciences and their country is still barely out of the agrarian stage. Not to mention, the Vietnamese hate the Chinese with the fury of a thousand suns.
edit on 25-2-2014 by Snsoc because: typo



new topics

top topics
 
8
<< 1   >>

log in

join