posted on Feb, 9 2014 @ 03:13 PM
reply to post by swanne
I do not see you have anything to appologize for, asking is the only way we learn and others showing us what they believe but belief can sometime's
be based on erroneous data, I think Einstein was the greatest genius to have lived in the last one hundred years and would likely have mopped the
floor with professor hawking's take on his theory's but quantum mechanics also has a lot to input into any new overall view of the universe and it's
Most accepted theory is base on elegant supposition and nice mathematic's but even math's has not got the answers and I for one do not buy the idea
that anything can be moddeled in mathematical formulae with enough data as some thing's in the real world are simple not able to be modelled no matter
how much data the observer gathers and this problem as given rise to a number of radical and odd theorys, you will notice high level physics has
integrated "UNCERTAINTY", "CHAOS", "RANDOM" and "PREDICTABLE" into the explanations used to express the PROBABLE outcome of percieved hypothetical
scenarios based on complex mathematical model systems of the universe and this is there way of saying "Well it might work like this, I don't really
know but I have a neat idea but it does not work all the time".
You are looking and if you do not look you will never find, anyway we enjoyed the thread or why would we have posted replys so thanks for putting it
up and like I say you may have recieved new data that you can then think OH that idea was a little off but hell if it was not for people like you we
would still be banging stone's together.
Alway's be a thinker, it is never a bad thing.
edit on 9-2-2014 by LABTECH767 because: (no reason given)