posted on Feb, 2 2014 @ 06:03 PM
reply to post by pauljs75
A 5" diameter sphere (4/3*pi*r^3*mass per cubic inch) of p239 is about 22.8kg, which is about 6.5kg higher than critical mass. A geometrically formed
split payload weighing say 16.3kg's would only require and external detonator trigger and that could be accommodated easily. Total weight would be in
the area of around 20kg or 50 lbs. What really concerns me about these things, is even though the handling is extremely dangerous during forming and
assembly, it still doesn't require a lot of technical know-how to produce low yield nuclear devices. I almost laid out the plans to build one of
these and thought better of it, you never know what or whom is reading these posts.
The ones that size require significant tritium boosting, and tritium decays and requires significant professional handling and maintenance.
Yes I know they require boosting and very specific geometry, I didn't want to get into the technology. As well there is cobalt and lithium, your
basic LID cake hydrogen device ;-)
Another problem, due to the small size is that devices of this nature can be built in to structures. Fukushima comes to mind. The Israeli's were
doing the camera security and some of the cameras looked like cylinder/gun triggers.
Now since Japan was allegedly selling fissionable material to Iran, one has to wonder if Fukushima was Israeli instigated rather than HAARP or natural
event instigated. But who knows, other than the person with their finger on the red button?
Cheers - Dave
Can I say, in a nice way, that you're off your rocker? Did the International Zionist Conspiracy do the tsunami too? Did you notice there was a
reactor meltdown and hydrogen explosion?
And why on earth would Japan bother to sell fissionable material to Iran, and how could Israel take such insane risks on something so mind-blowingly
Because they could have, would that be a good reason? The Israeli's provided the camera security and monitoring systems for Fukushima. There has been
quite a bit of information floating around concerning this subject. It has also been presented in past articles that Japan was selling fissionable
materials to Iran. What is it we look for, Motive (sale of materials to an enemy), Means (camera systems in fukushima) and Opportunity (convert camera
systems to contain questionable "devices")? And yes, I noticed there was a reactor meltdown, looks like three in fact, but it appears only the first
was externally triggered. Funny how only the first reaction produced the huge vertical ejection of materials and not the other two.
As far as HAARP you do understand how it can be manipulated, right? By using "tipping points" the injected billions of watts can induce massive
disturbances in earths systems. These people have had decades to learn through experimentation.
Cheers - Dave