It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
This paper argues that at least one of the following propositions is true: (1) the human species is very likely to go extinct before reaching a “posthuman” stage; (2) any posthuman civilization is extremely unlikely to run a significant number of simulations of their evolutionary history (or variations thereof); (3) we are almost certainly living in a computer simulation. It follows that the belief that there is a significant chance that we will one day become posthumans who run ancestor-simulations is false, unless we are currently living in a simulation. A number of other consequences of this result are also discussed.
Do we live in a program/matrix?
matrix (n.) Look up matrix at Dictionary.com
late 14c., "uterus, womb," from Old French matrice "womb, uterus," from Latin matrix (genitive matricis) "pregnant animal," in Late Latin "womb," also "source, origin," from mater (genitive matris) "mother" (see mother (n.1)). Sense of "place or medium where something is developed" is first recorded 1550s; sense of "embedding or enclosing mass" first recorded 1640s. Logical sense of "array of possible combinations of truth-values" is attested from 1914. As a verb from 1951.
jonnywhite
reply to post by DazDaKing
Don't understand these things you brought up:
1. Light communication somehow equates to non-local consciousness
2. If the universe is random then there must be infinite amounts of universes
I don't see how you make those "logical" jumps. It seems to me you're more interested in seeing the response in people than in the truth.
I think quantum entanglement is a better argument for some kind of non-local phenomenon. However, the science hasn't shown it has macro-scale effects.
What if this universe was made by a higher being with the utmost intention of it being random, but because the higher being made it, it's not truly random? For example, I can make a game with random environments or textures, but because of limitations in the number of bits and the pseudo nature of the RNG and my own limited experience with what's fashionably acceptable in random content, it's not truly random. However, for my purposes, it's random enough to fit the definition.
And even if no higher being was involved, I don't see why there's a requirement for infinite universes. It seems you're more interested in just restricting the potential than in finding the truth.edit on 25-12-2013 by jonnywhite because: (no reason given)
Don't understand these things you brought up:
1. Light communication somehow equates to non-local consciousness
2. If the universe is random then there must be infinite amounts of universes
If you figure out any cheat codes PM me.
So in this simulated reality are those things you hear about happening to other people, "miracles", basically glitches that just so happen to work in your favor? Or is it already specifically written in the code that something tragic followed quickly by something amazing is going to happen? Or does the set of codes work more like a formula that needs numbers (thoughts, actions?) plugged into it to get a changing yet specified result, which would determine ones life path and basically govern how their run goes?
Many people have been concerned about Surveillance agencies. Government, private, commercial entities do NOT want our data to track us, they need our data to use in the simulations that they are building right now, in the Utah desert, and all around us everyday
It's entirely possible that this reality is a simulation. It's also entirely possible that this reality is the dream of a hamster. In the end it's irrelevant and we can speculate until the cows come home. This existence is your own personal journey, make of it what you will.
well, if this all the matrix then i can do whatever i want, when i want over and over again. GREAT. It's groundhog day. he,he,