posted on Nov, 6 2013 @ 08:54 AM
Atheists frequently note perceived parallels between Christ and pagan deities as an indication that Christ is in some way derived from earlier false
gods. If it is fair to accept these parallels as evidence to the real origins of Christian beliefs, then the below parallel seems also to be worth
some consideration in regards to Christianity’s origin:
From Mark 14:10-12:
10 When he (Christ) was alone, the Twelve and the others around him asked him about the parables. 11 He told them, "The secret of the kingdom of God
has been given to you. But to those on the outside everything is said in parables 12 so that, "'they may be ever seeing but never perceiving, and
ever hearing but never understanding; otherwise they might turn and be forgiven!'"
From Plato’s Theaetetus:
Socrates: “In the name of the Graces, what an almighty wise man Protagoras must have been! He spoke these things in a parable to the common herd,
like you and me, but told the truth, his Truth, in secret to his own disciples.”
(Coincidence or intentional allusion? It is a simple decision like deciding between the red and blue pill.)
Protagoras was supposedly the first professional Sophist making his living by teaching for money. The Merriam-Webster online dictionary defines
2capitalized: any of a class of ancient Greek teachers of rhetoric, philosophy, and the art of successful living prominent about the middle of the
fifth century B.C. for their adroit subtle and allegedly often specious reasoning
3: a captious or fallacious reasoner
In Plato’s Sophist, Socrates and his companions struggle to define a Sophist. As they gradually work toward a definition, something occurs to
“Stranger: By heaven, they are cousins! It never occurred to us.
THEAETETUS: Who are cousins?
Stranger: The angler and the Sophist.
THEAETETUS: In what way are they related?
Stranger: They both appear to me to be hunters.”
As the dialogue progresses, it becomes clear that the object of the hunt for the Sophist is man and therefore one should then naturally view the idea
of “fishers of men” (Matthew 4:19) to be a reference to Sophists. It strikes me as incredible that atheists seem to have missed this. Don’t
they read Plato? Does the term “angler” instead of “fisherman” throw them? I am sure that some nitpickers will attempt to argue that there
is a significant difference between fishing with a hook and fishing with nets, but the motive is the same and given Christ’s parallel with
Protagoras, it seems that there is a good reason to view this connection as deliberate.
In Plato’s Protagoras we find this comment regarding the Sophists:
“Now the art of the Sophist is, as I believe, of great antiquity; but in ancient times those who practiced it, fearing this odium, veiled and
disguised themselves under various names, some under that of poets, as Homer, Hesiod, and Simonides, some, of hierophants and prophets, as Orpheus and
Musaeus, and some, as I observe, even under the name of gymnastic-masters, like Iccus of Tarentum, or the more recently celebrated Herodicus, now of
Selymbria and formerly of Megara, who is a first-rate Sophist. Your own Agathocles pretended to be a musician, but was really an eminent Sophist; also
Pythocleides the Cean; and there were many others; and all of them, as I was saying, adopted these arts as veils or disguises because they were afraid
of the odium which they would incur.”
This idea that the Sophists employed “veils” to hide their true nature has a couple of implications in regards to Christ. First of all there is
the “Messianic Secret” which involves Christ asking others to keep silent about who he really was. If the character of Christ was the veil of a
Sophist, then it is no longer any mystery as to what was really going on. (Christian apologists offer no less than four explanations for the
Messianic Secret which means that they really don’t know themselves or they are pretending not to know.)
Secondly, there is the story of St. Veronica. As if the Bible did not offer enough clues as to what was going on, “tradition” provides an
additional clue. Tradition tells us that a woman named Veronica supposedly wiped the face of Christ with her veil as he was carrying his cross to
Golgotha and as a result the image of Christ’s face miraculously appeared on the veil. The name “Veronica” is understood by many to mean
“true image”, so what are we to think when the “true image” of Christ is connected to a veil? This tradition seems so blatant in the message
that it sends, that one has to wonder why critics of Christianity have not picked up on it.
Furthermore it should be noted that the identification of Orpheus as a Sophist also helps to explain the parallels between Christ and Dionysus, while
the identification of Homer and Hesiod as Sophists indicates that Sophism played a major role in Greek religions as a whole, so why not Christianity?
It also seems obvious that the veils employed by the Sophists relied on their words having hidden meanings and this helps to explain the role that
parables played in Christ’s “ministry”. Could it be that the seemingly “fallacious” reasoning of the Sophists and Christians is the result
of their words having hidden meanings? Could the parallels between Christ and other deities simply be due to the fact that messages are being
repeated using the same metaphors or they are deliberate allusions inserted to provide context? Could the “errors” and “contradictions” which
so many critics have observed and which have been so carefully preserved in the Bible really have a hidden purpose or meaning which requires their
By failing to take the clues Plato offered in regards to Sophism seriously, we have failed to form a clear understanding of what Sophism is. How and
when Sophism began is difficult to determine, but it is clear that by the time Plato came onto the scene, they had already been responsible for
greatly altering people’s perceptions of the world by describing nearly everything in metaphor. It is the world created by the Sophists that was
the true subject of Plato’s Allegory of the Cave. Through their numerous covers and disguises the Sophists have had a major impact on the
world as we see it and until we recognize this fact, we are destined to be their slaves. It is the Sophists that have created the Matrix (a.k.a.
“egg in a basket”) in which we live.
It is up to the amateurs to expose the Sophists, because too much is at stake for the “experts”. Much of our educational system is based on the
literal and semi-literal understanding of their allegoric works and if they are exposed for what they really are, advanced degrees in philosophy,
history, religion, and other areas will become virtually worthless, because they are based on a false contexts and false understandings.