This topic is in the Other Current Events discussion forum.  (rss)


Town criminalizes compliance with Patriot Act




Topic started on 19-5-2003 @ 07:17 PM by dragonrider


ARCATA, California (AP) -- More than 100 cities and one state have passed resolutions condemning the USA Patriot Act, saying it gives the federal government too much snooping power. But in this liberal fold of Northern California's Redwood Curtain, a simple denouncement just doesn't go far enough.

To cooperate with the act, the City Council says, is criminal.

edition.cnn.com...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-5-2003 @ 07:20 PM by dragonrider


A blown-off finger, a skin burn or a respiratory illness were not normally reasons for an emergency room doctor to call the FBI. But now, with the threat of terrorism, they could be.

The FBI's Pittsburgh office wants to know about health problems that could signal the outbreak of a terrorist attack or the release of a biological agent, and now it has a way of culling that information quickly.

www.pittsburghlive.com...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-5-2003 @ 09:18 PM by DClark


Only $57??

Hopefully other cities follow suit.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-5-2003 @ 02:12 AM by xaos


*clapclapclapclapclapclapclap*

Mybe this could happen on a national scale????

About time the people wised up

XAOS



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-5-2003 @ 02:47 AM by Grommer


There are entire counties in Utah that arent going along with it. Weber county, Salt Lake county, and I believe there are more. Dont misquote me, but there are also towns in Alaska that are doing the same thing



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-5-2003 @ 03:43 AM by jagdflieger


Do not worry kiddies, the FED's already have the means to make the states fall in line with the USA Patriot Act. You see the FED's pratice what may be called preemptive taxation. They jack up the federal tax rates so that the states and local governments have trouble raising enough money to operate; people cannot afford to pay much more in taxes. Then the FED's "gives" this money back to the states for various purposes. The only problem is that the FED's will tell the states, "If you don't pass the laws we want, we won't give you any money". Anyone remember the infamous double nickel (55 mph speed limit in Carter's admistration)? Well the FED's wanted a national 55 mph speed limit (highway speed limits are determined by state law). The way the FED's did it was to tell the states that the federal government would withhold federal highway money from a state unless it passed a 55 mph speed limit law. Since no state can maintain its highways without federal money, they all passed the 55 mph speed limit. The same thing happened when the FED's wanted the limit for DUI lowered from 0.10 percent to 0.08 percent. The FED's simply told the states if you don't pass the law, you don't get your highway money. All the FED's have to do, is tell the states that they will not get highway money (or some other federal funding) unless the state pass laws supporting the USA Patriot Act.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:


























ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.074 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread
Forums Directory