Conservative media outlets found guilty of biased global warming coverage

page: 2
6
<< 1   >>

log in

join

posted on Oct, 13 2013 @ 07:42 PM
link   
reply to post by badgerprints
 


Its common curtesy to declare if you are posting from a seperation source or drawing your conclusion from the OP I have 7 links there. I read the article however the links within the article I skimed over.

Do you agree or dissagree that less than 1% of the scientists dissagree that global warming is caused by humans. .7% actually. I noticed you left that part out when sumerizing.

As far as the OP goes a phage pointed out its about the media misrepresenting the overall consensus in the scientific community. Would you say they represent it accurately or in accurately?

I sometimes hear them act like climate gate was actually a scandle. The only thing scandleous about it was how the media twisted it. It was about tree rings for gods sake. Some are actually trying to say its cooling. That's pretty damn deceitful.

From now on I will be more careful when replying I tend to get sloppy when I am in a rush. It's a lesson learned.


Yes I should have looked closer at your post but I was in a hurry and it didn't look familiar but when people throw up quotes without sourcing them it agrivates me to the point where I don't pay them much attention.

I am glad to see you read my threads even if you don't agree with me I don't usually think anyone will in the first place when posting them. I just want people to think about them and that's enough.
edit on 13-10-2013 by Grimpachi because: (no reason given)






new topics
 
6
<< 1   >>

log in

join