It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Science Proves God = CHIRHO (RX) Means 'E=MC^2'

page: 4
24
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 5 2013 @ 03:16 PM
link   

anon29
reply to post by 1Providence1
 


I would like to hear more about what it has helped you to understand.


Could you explain where you are having trouble understanding the information?

I am willing to work with you until you understand it.

So really it's going to boil down to effort and motivation.
Are you willing to stay after class and sacrifice your free time?

It's really simple and I will go over it in countless ways if needed.



posted on Oct, 5 2013 @ 03:26 PM
link   
Going to put up more Einstein quotes, and start with the one I just found in case others missed it since it's on the bottom of the last page. I would say everyone should check out what this man had to say, it's worth it.




“Creativity is knowing how to hide your sources”
― Albert Einstein





“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein





“Coincidence is God's way of remaining anonymous.”
― Albert Einstein, The World as I See It





“A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it.”
― Albert Einstein





“Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.”
― Albert Einstein





“If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research, would it?”
― Albert Einstein





“I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious.”
― Albert Einstein





“Education is what remains after one has forgotten what one has learned in school.”
― Albert Einstein





“Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important thing is to not stop questioning.”
― Albert Einstein, Relativity: The Special and the General Theory




“Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.”
― Albert Einstein




“If I were not a physicist, I would probably be a musician. I often think in music. I live my daydreams in music. I see my life in terms of music.”
― Albert Einstein





“You never fail until you stop trying.”
― Albert Einstein





“The most beautiful experience we can have is the mysterious - the fundamental emotion which stands at the cradle of true art and true science.”
― Albert Einstein, Albert Einstein


This thread is about the cradle of Art meeting Science through symbolism, and revealing the source of Einstein's famous equation.




“Any fool can know. The point is to understand.”
― Albert Einstein



posted on Oct, 5 2013 @ 03:32 PM
link   
reply to post by muzzleflash
 



So you aren't explaining how I am wrong?



E = Everything = God


M = Mass = Point of Matter Rotating = Rho + Circle

C^2 = Light = Two Lines Crossed = Making a Square = 90degree angles


This is speculation, extrapolation, interpretation. There's no other way to put it. You are mixing and matching the words and symbols used until your square peg just barely fits into the round whole, before declaring yourself a genius just because it isn't a complete and absolute failure.

This technique is not uncommon inside a 2nd grade classroom, and just about as effective as well.
edit on 5-10-2013 by AfterInfinity because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 5 2013 @ 03:36 PM
link   
reply to post by 1Providence1
 


Oh? Please, tell me more about how scientific abstract deduction is.


existing in thought or as an idea but not having a physical or concrete existence.


How is that scientific?

edit on 5-10-2013 by AfterInfinity because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 5 2013 @ 03:44 PM
link   

AfterInfinity
reply to post by muzzleflash
 



So you aren't explaining how I am wrong?


I'm asking you to explain it as though you actually care about making us understand. Then I'll see if there's anything to be proven wrong.


I did multiple times.

So actually you are admitting you have nothing to debate with, and instead want to play coy and pretend like I haven't repeated it multiple times?

Start from C^2 = X.
Explain how you don't understand exactly.

Then we can go through each component of the equation, and find out exactly where you are struggling in order for me to identify it and help you specifically.



posted on Oct, 5 2013 @ 03:44 PM
link   
reply to post by muzzleflash
 


Go back and look at my post.



posted on Oct, 5 2013 @ 03:49 PM
link   

AfterInfinity


This is speculation, extrapolation, interpretation. There's no other way to put it. You are mixing and matching the words and symbols used until your square peg just barely fits into the round whole, before declaring yourself a genius just because it isn't a complete and absolute failure.

edit on 5-10-2013 by AfterInfinity because: (no reason given)


Which part specifically is speculation?

Interpretation is necessary to understand any language, everyone should strive to improve their capacity for it.

Please debate fairly, you are just giving personal opinions.

Please also explain how Einstein got his formula if this isn't the source that he "creatively hid" from us for so long.



posted on Oct, 5 2013 @ 03:53 PM
link   

AfterInfinity
reply to post by muzzleflash
 


Go back and look at my post.


It's just opinions.

You haven't provided logic or shown any work yet.

I explained my logic in depth, and showed ALL of my work to prove it.

If you are not willing to start from square 1 and explain how you aren't understanding, and allow me to explain it to you, and aren't willing to question me every step of the way honestly in order to actually understand, than you will never get it.

Frankly at this point I am afraid this is about personal pride.
People often are too prideful to accept the facts because it's implications are too dire.

Please, people don't have to live that way.
We can be honest and ask real questions and seek real answers.

All of these insults without even bothering to address the facts is very petty.
And totally unscientific at that.



posted on Oct, 5 2013 @ 03:56 PM
link   
reply to post by muzzleflash
 



Please debate fairly, you are just giving personal opinions.


Literally, so are you. Maybe 5%-7% of what you posted is fact. The rest of it is something that "could mean this" or "might mean that" or "can be loosely interpreted to represent such and such". Very little of your stuff is conclusive. That's what I mean when I say that you are speculating.

This thread is a huge disappointment. Maybe I deserved it for expecting something valuable.


Please also explain how Einstein got his formula if this isn't the source that he "creatively hid" from us for so long.


I don't have to prove a damn thing to you. You started this thread, remember? You claimed you could prove this stuff. And now that you figured out you might have the wrong answer, you want me to give you the right one. I'm not here to give you the answer, I'm here to tell you that yours was poorly crafted and poorly delivered. Now, less speculating and more conclusive evidence! I haven't seen any yet.

And I wouldn't be nearly so irritated if this weren't becoming a trend on ATS. Speculate, conclude and distribute.
edit on 5-10-2013 by AfterInfinity because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 5 2013 @ 04:12 PM
link   
reply to post by AfterInfinity
 


I have stood by the OP pretty well.
And explained it in like 5 ways by now.

You refuse to address even the first step?

C^2 = X ?

Does this make sense?
If not, why?

How would you symbolize light squared in the simplest most basic way?



posted on Oct, 5 2013 @ 04:18 PM
link   

AfterInfinity
Speculate, conclude and distribute.


That's a great description for your activity I agree.

However I describe my OP like this as I prefer accuracy :

"Investigate, work out, work out again from other perspectives, form theory, continue working aspects, then bring to public when ready".

Are you in denial?
Are you against Science or against Religion?
Which one do you despise so bad you will refuse to acknowledge the connection ?

Because basically the facts are that modern science is just clever rewriting of ancient religion.
Proven fact, worked it out and explained it.

If even 1 person understood it, they will understand E=mc^2 in it's pure simplicity.



posted on Oct, 5 2013 @ 04:30 PM
link   
Maybe the problem is that very few understand what MC^2 looks like.
Because they never tried to draw it graphically, I suppose.
I never did either but was curious and wanted to.

It's actually so painfully simple that the only problem here is people rejecting it because it's too simple and too basic.

Well I am sorry but MC^2 is simple and if you think the ancients didn't know about it than you are sadly mistaken.

Everyone keeps expecting everything to be complicated, but that's totally wrong.
We over complicate everything.

You really need to just wipe the slate clean, there are too many BS unfounded beliefs getting in the way.

Start out like a caveman and think from the most basic ground up direction.
This way you will know each step for sure beyond any doubts.

C^2 creates a Square Graph ( X )
M creates a Rotating Point (Rho + Circle)

Kids will be able to learn such simple things easily and truly understand them.

Adults who already believe they know everything?
They will probably just insult it and deride it without actually explaining any specific aspect.



posted on Oct, 5 2013 @ 04:34 PM
link   
reply to post by muzzleflash
 



Are you in denial?
Are you against Science or against Religion?
Which one do you despise so bad you will refuse to acknowledge the connection ?


This isn't about me. It's about the fact that your theory is a very poor one. I'm not convinced. No one here is convinced. The only person who might be convinced is you.


Because basically the facts are that modern science is just clever rewriting of ancient religion.
Proven fact, worked it out and explained it.


I don't think you know what a "proven fact" is. What you've got is "extrapolation".



posted on Oct, 5 2013 @ 04:44 PM
link   
reply to post by muzzleflash
 


Yes, loved Revelations of the pyramid.

Its all related!

I found the long version as a torrent file.

I wonder if the Great Pyramid was built by God (the avatar, or representative) himself, and all the rest are us mimicking his!

The golden ratio is in that pyramid!!

The pyramid being 8 sided really blew me away, with the alignments!

truly mysterious!

LEXXTEX 396 - THE REVELATION OF THE PYRAMIDS OF E
www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYS97kNIW-M
www.youtube.com...


Copyright battle described in description over youtube usage, so watch while you can!!

 


Remember how I mentioned a thought of the Universe being a living cell?

What if: The cell dies??

The Universe S02E18 Cosmic Apocalypse
www.youtube.com/watch?v=grM3KRhmokk
www.youtube.com...


Just a side thought



posted on Oct, 5 2013 @ 04:46 PM
link   
reply to post by muzzleflash
 



I figured, hmmm... light is like a straight line, so squaring it what do I have? A Cross...an X.


How does the speed of light squared = an X?



posted on Oct, 5 2013 @ 04:49 PM
link   
ahh the Beloved Chi Rho,,, S I X ,,, can u make a Chi Rho,,, from 6?



posted on Oct, 5 2013 @ 04:58 PM
link   
reply to post by AfterInfinity
 


I will continue attempting to inform you despite your complete rejection without willing to explain why or show any reasoning towards that end.

Your unwillingness to debate the scientific logic based aspects is a poker tell.

I don't have to convince you specifically of anything in the end.
All I have to do is lead you to up the ante high enough in the process.

I already showed my hand from the get go, that's how I play poker, cards up.

You can pull out your gun and yell, but it doesn't change the fact the Maverick is here.
It's not cheating, it's just any card I touch becomes wild and explosive, sorta like Gambit.




posted on Oct, 5 2013 @ 05:00 PM
link   

usertwelve
reply to post by muzzleflash
 



I figured, hmmm... light is like a straight line, so squaring it what do I have? A Cross...an X.


How does the speed of light squared = an X?


On a Graph?
Cartesian Coordinates?
#

edit on 5-10-2013 by muzzleflash because: (no reason given)


Also note this user actually asked an honest question.
So I can give a direct answer.

Open for any more questions I will try my best to find where the issue is and address it.
edit on 5-10-2013 by muzzleflash because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 5 2013 @ 05:05 PM
link   
reply to post by usertwelve
 


The Circle with the waves at bottom is speed of light!

the 6 pointed star = mass

and as a whole its energy!!

 



muzzleflash





also:
Because of the circle,
Pi is here along with Phi

I also see symbology in the 2 pillars in the image. The 2 pillars are also used way back, egypt, sumeria, etc.

The dove, too bad we can't see if there is a second dove or other symbol, like the last piece of the puzzle missing!!



posted on Oct, 5 2013 @ 05:15 PM
link   

AfterInfinity
And now that you figured out you might have the wrong answer


Well past tense but yeah.

That's what everyone should consider any time they have an idea.

That's why I went back and worked it over and over again from all sorts of angles.
To make sure this thing works properly.

It does.

To undo that all you have to do is articulate and explain why not without relying on assumptions.



new topics

top topics



 
24
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join