posted on Oct, 3 2013 @ 01:34 PM
reply to post by swanne
There are such actors and politically motivated organizations in US and Canada too, you know.
Whats your point?
point was that foreign and local politically motivated organizations have used aggression for over a hundred years to implement some form of
control over Somalia. The end goal of all these organizations is to establish a monopoly of power in that nation. Just because some of these forces
are practically governments in exile does not diminish the fact that if given the opportunity they would establish there own form control. So in no
way is this "anarchy". One might call it chaos, but chaos and anarchy are not necessarily synonymous, especially when you are using the definitions
of classical anarchist philosophers.
Hell there are countries in the west that are experiencing chaos in one form or an other right now, no one would call it a result of anarchy because
the governments are the ones who are the main source of the problems not renegade bandit lords raiding towns.