Proof of nothing. Latest chemtrail "proof"

page: 1
3

log in

join

posted on Sep, 30 2013 @ 12:19 PM
link   
This video is offered as proof of something. I will provide the transcript of the video for those who don't wish to watch it, or for those who have already made up their minds.
In it, a fuzzy French guy takes a camera into the cockpit of a plane and asks the co-pilot a few questions.




"Fuzzy guy- do you speak English too?

Flight attendant- no

Fuzzy guy-Just a question to you, Hello.

Co-pilot- Hi

Fuzzy guy- Do you speak English?

Co-pilot- sure, what do you need?

Fuzzy guy- Ok, just a question, do you know what is a chemtrail?

Co-pilot- I do know what a chemtrail is

Fuzzy guy- and is it true?

Co-pilot- um, there is a big debate

Fuzzy guy- Yea

Co-pilot- are you filming me?

Fuzzy guy- maybe, huh huh. Ok, I turn it off. There. Do you believe it?

Co-pilot- um, well, I don’t have enough information for that.

Fuzzy guy- ok, well, I saw a lot of video’s on the internet and it really looks, ah, believable.
Co-pilot- well, it’s arguable both ways I think. Depends on which side you’re on.

Fuzzy guy- what is your personal opinion on it?

Co-pilot- I think there is part of truth

Fuzzy guy- because if it’s true, so many people suffer this…….

Co-pilot- it’s a necessary evil I think.

Fuzzy guy- Thank you so much

Co-pilot- have a good day sir."


This is proof that the co-pilot doesn't know anything about chemtrails being real, he only offers his opinion.




posted on Sep, 30 2013 @ 12:26 PM
link   
reply to post by network dude
 


Shouldn't this be a reply to the OP? Here
edit on 30-9-2013 by Staroth because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 30 2013 @ 12:33 PM
link   

Staroth
reply to post by network dude
 


Shouldn't this be a reply to the OP? Here
edit on 30-9-2013 by Staroth because: (no reason given)


Damage control

scnd



posted on Sep, 30 2013 @ 12:36 PM
link   

Staroth
reply to post by network dude
 


Shouldn't this be a reply to the OP? Here
edit on 30-9-2013 by Staroth because: (no reason given)


It could, but it would be on page 22 or some such nonsense. The transcript should have been on the first page of the OP of that thread. I am just offering the text since a lot of folks are just too lazy to watch the video and blindly believe the title. If once you read the text, you still think this is proof of something, super.



posted on Sep, 30 2013 @ 12:41 PM
link   
reply to post by network dude
 


I agree with you it is proof of nothing.
The context makes it clear he just adresses the fact contrails exist.

But I do see this in a seperate topic a way of "damage" control that rubs a bit.



posted on Sep, 30 2013 @ 12:54 PM
link   
reply to post by EartOccupant
 


I think most of the chemtrail crowd has their minds made up already.

Damage control is a mute point. The damage has been done. It just irritates me to some something mis-represented like this.



posted on Sep, 30 2013 @ 02:39 PM
link   
You may want to research the "space preservation act" of 2001, for evidence of chemtrails. In the bill, chemtrails are listed as exotic weapons. Not sure what type of evidence your looking for...actual samples taken and analyzed by yourself?



posted on Sep, 30 2013 @ 02:49 PM
link   
reply to post by network dude
 


already posted
www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Sep, 30 2013 @ 02:56 PM
link   
reply to post by Tucket
 

Is that the one that also called for a ban on the use of extraterrestrial weapons? So that would mean we couldn't have used anything our space brothers had to offer. Bummer.

Maybe you should read a bit about who actually wrote that bill and how silly it was.


edit on 9/30/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 30 2013 @ 03:19 PM
link   
Thanks for the heads up.



posted on Sep, 30 2013 @ 04:09 PM
link   
reply to post by network dude
 


The co-pilot says, "part of" and, "Necessary evil" in relation to the two separate questions.

However he already said he didn't have "enough information". (there is some ambiguity there since the filming episode came into place) But I consider Fuzzy was resuming the conversation.
Once he said that, anything that came afterward means nothing, other than a personal opinion. Although both of the two first quotes are not something new, and their likely origin is in statements from those who are in climate research, the co-pilot is still entitled to an opinion though. He just did not offer anything else.
So I agree that the video says and shows nowt.
BTW, that airport looks a bit like Murcia in Spain, could be wrong though But if so, how your Mr Fuzzy got to talk to the cockpit crew in in the cockpit, in them there parts is something else.

edit on 30-9-2013 by smurfy because: Text.



posted on Oct, 1 2013 @ 10:25 PM
link   
reply to post by smurfy
 


Aeromexico





 
3

log in

join