posted on Sep, 13 2013 @ 09:08 AM
I have a theory regarding predicting future events. I see the potential of future events in three branches, three potential directions which any event
can unfold, and in turn becoming nine potential lines of progression of future potential events.
I may be completely bonkers, but this way of "pseudo prediction" has worked well for me for years, taking potential outcomes of a current situation
or event and influencing that outcome which is within my power to influence. When an outcome within my power of influence is to my advantage, without
directly taking advantage or abusing another, I will exercise my influence on events.
We have people in the world with resources greater than most, who would exercise influence events for their own gain. Those events are usually not
directly apparent to most, but there is manipulation.
I think it's referred to as a conspiracy!. OK, let's play!, we here at ATS are info-addicts, and really only enrich the power companies with our
addiction, while being pleasantly, and sometimes not so pleasantly distracted.
Instead of just babbling on about random events and expressing our reasonable, and sometimes not-so-reasonable opinions regarding bazillions of
supposedly unconnected events, how about we try, through our own info-addictive tendencies to cooperatively scour through all of this STATIC, and try
to predict by the numbers the potential outcomes of world events.
Branch 1- Forward toward an obvious potential outcome.
Branch 2- An outcome overshadowing, or distracting from the obvious potential of branch 1.
Branch 3-The polar opposite of the obvious potential of branch 1.
This going to be potentially the longest thread in history, or the shortest, because it is a rally vague one. Can anyone else see the reasoning, or
lack of reasoning to this methodology, if one could even call it that?.