It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
What he didn't mention was that his administration knew about the alleged nerve-gas attack three days before it happened.
At a U.S. intelligence briefing Friday afternoon, senior administration officials disclosed that there were indications three days prior that an attack was coming.
'In the three days prior to the attack, we collected streams of human, signals and geospatial intelligence that reveal regime activities that we assess were association with preparations for a chemical weapons attack,' the U.S. intelligence report released by the Obama administration said.
While Obama's Department of Justice seeks to shield the Bush Administration by declaring their war crimes “business as usual,” his Department of Defense prepares to eliminate hard evidence of those crimes by destroying Syria's stockpile of weapons of mass destruction. Those WMDs came from us.
U.S. Army Col. ANTHONY J. MACDONALD’s mail. Macdonald is General Staff Director, Operations and Plans Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence the Army Staff. It’s about chemical attack in Syria.
In the message August 22 Eugene Furst congratulates Col. on successful operation and refers him to Wasington Post publication about chemical attack in Syria. From the Anthony’s wife dialog with her friend it’s clear the video with the children killed in the chemical attack near Damascus was staged by U.S. Intelligence.
Originally posted by Pinkorchid
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
Do you know how they knew?
They knew because they put them there themselves , that's how they knew chemical weapons existed in Syria.
While Obama's Department of Justice seeks to shield the Bush Administration by declaring their war crimes “business as usual,” his Department of Defense prepares to eliminate hard evidence of those crimes by destroying Syria's stockpile of weapons of mass destruction. Those WMDs came from us.
By Frank Gregory Ford, former U.S. Military Intelligence Agent
www.waynemadsenreport.com...
That's why they were so cock-sure that they could pin it on Assad because they had planted it.
Originally posted by Crumbles
reply to post by Pinkorchid
I agree with you.
This situation is just touchy, because we are the self proclaimed police of the world. The majority of other countries rely on us to take this role as well. So they look at us, and wonder how we can let chemical weapons use go unpunished.
In a perfect world we should stick in our borders sure. This is far from a perfect world, and everyone looks upon us to go in and clean up assads mess. Whether he did the bombing or the rebels. The use needs to be put to rest. If they see we let them get away with it. Who is next?
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
firstly if the planted allegation is true then that still doesn't "force" Assad to use it.
On Monday, Eman Nabih, an Egyptian blogger translated a video by Nadime Baloush, a radical extremist and a terrorist who stated that the Muslim Brotherhood and other Al-Qaeda backed rebels have used chemical weapons and will use chemical weapons in Syria.
"“”I know that these chemical weapons are very dangerous to use against Civilians – But what can we do? We don’t have any alternatives – So, we will do as Our Osama Bin Laden Great Leader said: ”We must punish those who punish us, we must kill their men, their women and their kids. And I repeat what he said, we must kill their children and women And we won’t stop killing their women and children, till they stop killing ours. The idea of that statement of mine, is because the regime tried to break in where we are staying in the mountains, “Baloush said.
Secondly Syria has plenty of capability to make and deliver Sarin - there is no need at all for the US to supply it.
Iran was publicly alleging that illegal chemical attacks were carried out on its forces, and was building a case to present to the United Nations. But it lacked the evidence implicating Iraq, much of which was contained in top secret reports and memoranda sent to the most senior intelligence officials in the U.S. government. The CIA declined to comment for this story.
They show that senior U.S. officials were being regularly informed about the scale of the nerve gas attacks. They are tantamount to an official American admission of complicity in some of the most gruesome chemical weapons attacks ever launched.
Unanticipated outcomes of the 2002 Afghan civilian studies , Radiological measurements of the uranium concentrations in Afghan civilians’ urine samples indicate abnormally high levels of non-depleted uranium. Radiological measurements of Afghan civilians’ have high concentrations of uranium in a range beginning at 4 X’s and reaching to over 20 X’s normal populations. This is 400% to 2000% higher than the study controls and normal population baselines of the concentrations of nanograms of uranium per liter of urine in a 24-hour sample. UMRC has completed initial but still preliminary studies that corroborate these finding in biological controls and geological samples taken in Operation Enduring Freedom bombsites.
Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by Pinkorchid
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
Do you know how they knew?
They knew because they put them there themselves , that's how they knew chemical weapons existed in Syria.
While Obama's Department of Justice seeks to shield the Bush Administration by declaring their war crimes “business as usual,” his Department of Defense prepares to eliminate hard evidence of those crimes by destroying Syria's stockpile of weapons of mass destruction. Those WMDs came from us.
By Frank Gregory Ford, former U.S. Military Intelligence Agent
www.waynemadsenreport.com...
That's why they were so cock-sure that they could pin it on Assad because they had planted it.
Err...no.
firstly if the planted allegation is true then that still doesn't "force" Assad to use it.
Secondly Syria has plenty of capability to make and deliver Sarin - there is no need at all for the US to supply it.
thirdly Syria is co-operates with Iran on such projects.
There is not now and never has been any need for the US to plant chemical weapons in Syria.
Madsen is an idiot for suggesting so - but being a career conspiracy theorist it suits him to make things up like that because he knows that thousands of people want to believe him, and pay him to reinforce their existing beliefs.