posted on Aug, 31 2013 @ 07:55 AM
Originally posted by Aliensun
As long as some people believe and promote the government line that we don't have a space-capable vehicle for manned flight, I'll keep jumping in to
remind them that the black triangles seem to very easily fit the bill for a general purpose weapon and supply vehicle. They are undeniable. Reports
of their immense size (that of a C-5 or larger) and fantastic capabilities of motion given time and time again by citizens (myself include) are
indicative that they are capable hardware that make rockets totally obsolete.
Yes there was a time when i noticed 'UFO'S' ( in the sense that they really are unidentified) quite often when looking at 'chemtrails' and all
the related weather phenomenon. My conclusion at the time was basically that the US would not mess up it's own weather patterns like that and would
also not have a obvious reason to send their own high tech 'aircraft' ( oval/circle ish shaped craft) to observe these events so my theory was that
whichever foreign power were changing US weather patterns were also deploying these high tech craft to monitor the US chemtrail laying aircraft (
chem trails being a means to interpret what was being done to the weather patterns) over the continental US. Either way these craft seem to be pretty
ubiquitous on chemtrail forums and i still think that is significant even if i am less sure as to the who and the why than i used to be.
The US government has never supplied us with a good answer to why the US space vehicle programs ended with the retirement of the shuttle.
Because the space shuttle's were terribly expensive way of doing what they were supposedly doing and there are not too many reasons one can think of
for their continued usage when they have proved to be so unreliable despite the best efforts of some of the best and brightest minds.
* The US had no better way of accomplishing satellite launches and crew delivery to LEO..
* Regular bureaucratic ineptitude and contract fraud kept the Shuttle's in service despite tremendous mission costs.
*The Us were being actively prevented by some foreign ( or i guess REALLY foreign) powers from replacing the shuttle with a useful launch vehicle and
the best compromise was to use the shuttle in a quasi military capacity but with civilian 'cover'; enemies can not blow it up if everyone believes
it has a non military function.
That's pretty much the major themes but perhaps you can think of better reasons why the Russians of supposedly all are providing the US with the
rockets to keep it's civilian/military space program going.
The simple reason is because we have cracked the ability to build UFO-like vehicles. So those fantastic, dark triangular shapes hide a lot
more secrets than merely being a new type of craft.
Keep in mind that they are not even "aircraft." They don't use atmospheric air for lift or control.
Sure but the massive build up of conventional US forces suggest, if it isn't just the same old contract&military establishment fraud, EXACTLY the
opposite and is in line with these fantastic craft actually belonging to someone or *something* else. Why didn't the US take our Yugoslavia, Iraq,
Iran, North Korea, Afghanistan and whoever else stands up with this force of high tech aircraft? Why did the US require ten years of sanctions and air
bombardment before they felt confident in finishing off Saddam? Why was the air campaign against Yugoslavia such an abortion of an operation? It my
reasoning it certainly makes more sense if these high tech craft were in fact preventing or reigning IN us aggression against the rest of the
But yes, when discussing this sort of thing there is more conjecture involved in tying the 'facts'&'observations' together than there are facts
and observations to be tied together so one really can let your imagination go and have much strait faced 'fun' with it. It's something like
cosmology models where it all hangs together pretty well as long as you presume into existence 95% more mass than you can observe with your current
level of technology.
If that doesn't help you to believe to go where your best reasoning from primary source material leads you i do not know