I'm not sure how to phrase the thought which troubles me in a single sentence, other than to ask the question of the thread title. There are two
threads hitting ATS .lines today which really give a person pause for consideration when taken 'hand in glove', if you pardon the pun.
Firstly there's this thread, regarding the new NSA disclosure of http snooping
which confirms what Snowden was saying from the outset. Then there's this thread, which
discusses frank, open-handed information on 'Mind Control'
- which proves that the US shadow government/front-facing political groups have
been/ are still actively pursuing varied means of exerting specific, extended duration control over the minds of the citizens the government is
supposed to represent fairly.
In the UK recently we had a 'special' on the BBC which related to experimentation in synthetic telepathy. We also learnt that 'esoteric' subjects
are going to be censored as much as possible, along with the obvious candidate subjects of pornography and violence. Even the censorship, via
official statute, of the last two subjects is questionable; the use of 'esoteric subjects' as a category of censorship can be easily expanded to
include conspiracy sites.
You will think, read & watch what we allow you to.
That is, in essence, what is being proposed.
It's all being discussed openly, and barely a squeak from the masses.
If this stuff had been revealed forty years ago (IE - this technology revealed in that social climate) there may well have been riots in the streets.
As it is, the millions who may fall prey to this technology will simply do as they always do, and claim that a person would have to be crazy to
consider such a fool idea.
Even though the technology in its initial phases is already in operation against them, they may never appreciate the dangers of what is happening to
them. They are at risk of being manipulated into committing violence, or succumbing to hypnotic fascist plots to lead them to the gas chambers/off
the edge of a ledge, should this technology continue to be rolled out more widely than it currently is. Some poor folk already have been, on all
counts and more, of that I am confident.
The gang stalking victims are often mocked and derided if they try to seek help or speak openly of their experiences. Yes, some were definitely
mentally unstable - some may have had spiritual affliction; others may have been test subjects for the Orwellian cabal.
Good luck and God bless, I fear that the erosion of our freedoms may continue apace now that these issues are being addressed openly - and nobody much
seems to give a hoot.