It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
here you are promoting this "Jesus didn't exist" guy, while he's demonizing and trying to obliterate Christianity, are you going to repudiate him, too?
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by adjensen
Nope, they're both rejected, except by apologetic die-hards. The Jesus Forgery: Josephus Untangled
The Testimonium that we have in the late manuscripts of Josephus has clearly and obviously been “doctored up” by a Christian scribe, since Josephus himself (as we know, e.g., from his autobiography) never became a Christian and so did not himself believe that Jesus was the messiah who was raised from the dead in fulfillment of the Scriptures (as the Testimonium relates).
But Josephus did refer to Jesus, and he does give us some valuable information about him. And he is the first non-Christian source to do so. This is important historical data, as it shows that Jesus was thought of as having lived a real life by the most important Jewish historian of the first century. As such the Testimonium provides us with some much-needed confirmation of information that we can glean from our Christian sources. (Source)
here you are promoting this "Jesus didn't exist" guy, while he's demonizing and trying to obliterate Christianity, are you going to repudiate him, too?
As usual, Instead of attacking the data presented, you attack the name of the website cited. By the way, I haven't perused his web site other than to mine the essay on Nazareth.
Good grief, you're citing Achyra S as a scholarly source? Get a clue, that woman is a fraud.
Here is what an actual scholar (who is not a Christian, so has no skin in the game) has to say:
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by adjensen
Good grief, you're citing Achyra S as a scholarly source? Get a clue, that woman is a fraud.
Again, attack the data, not the author. You have yet to address the citations that are presented in the article. They are credible citations.
Bart Erhman makes a statement with nothing to back it up. He fails to address the very issues that puts that quote into question. While he makes a shamble of the credibility of the gospels, he is careful to defend the faith. He is an apologetic.
Regardless, that whole article is about the second passage from Josephus, not the first, which is the one in question.
The official description is: Analysis of the evidence from the works of Origen, Eusebius, and Hegesippus concludes that the reference to “Christ” in Josephus, Jewish Antiquities 20.200 is probably an accidental interpolation or scribal emendation and that the passage was never originally about Christ or Christians. It referred not to James the brother of Jesus Christ, but probably to James the brother of the Jewish high priest Jesus ben Damneus.
My proof of that is pretty conclusive. But this article also summarizes a sufficient case to reject the Testimonium Flavianum as well (the other, longer reference to Jesus in Josephus), in that case as a deliberate fabrication (see note 1, pp. 489-90, and discussion of the Arabic quotation on pp. 493-94). And I cite the leading scholarship on both. So it’s really a complete article on both references to Jesus in Josephus.
------------------
Goldberg also shows that the Testimonium contains vocabulary and phrasing that is particularly Christian (indeed, Lukan) and un-Josephan. He concludes that this means either a Christian wrote it or Josephus slavishly copied a Christian source, and contrary to what Goldberg concludes, the latter is wholly implausible (Josephus would treat such a source more critically, creatively, and informedly).
That, combined with the arguments I assemble in my article for JECS, spells the final death knell for any hope of restoring any part of the Testimonium Flavianum. It is 100% Christian fabrication.
Richard Carrier: freethoughtblogs.com...
“Those who don't know history are doomed to repeat it.” ― Edmund Burke
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by Itisnowagain
So what? I like history.
“Those who don't know history are doomed to repeat it.” ― Edmund Burke
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by Itisnowagain
Why are you giving members, like myself, a hard time for discussing history in thread about history? Don't like it? Don't read the thread.