It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MidnightTide
reply to post by frazzle
NATO is FAR worse than the Taliban or Muslim Brotherhood ever dreamed of being. Get rid of them first, okay?
I see them all as a den of thieves - making deals and alliances with one another, constantly changing to meet their own agenda. The people, well they are just annoying inconveniences to them. If some have to be scrapped to further their goals that is of no consequence to them.
Originally posted by badgerprints
Originally posted by dragonridr
Originally posted by badgerprints
People need to look further back in mideast history.
No matter who is in charge or who hates who in Egypt, all guns eventually point towards Israel.
Those F-16's will be used eventually.
Six Days of War by Michael Oren would be a great place to start reading if you really want to understand the middle east military mindset.
There are safe guards without replacement parts within 2 yrs will be non operational one year if they fly them around to make hearts in the sky like i saw in another thread.And dont believe we cant hack into the avionics any time we want.
What makes you think "we" will hack into anything? "We" (you, apparently, not me) gave the jets to them in the first place.
There are no actual safe guards when politicians play with military hardware.
Originally posted by MidnightTide
But back to Egypt, as long as the military hold the reigns of power (and is beholden to whoever pays them the most - to back this up after the latest coup Saudi Arabia donates 5 billion to Egypt and suddenly Sharia Law is now in their constitution) essentially the people of Egypt are going to get the raw deal. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
edit on 12-7-2013 by MidnightTide because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
reply to post by frazzle
Well if you want me to be blunt the only known system to tackle the bilderbergers effectively is communism. But it comes with lots of strings attached and a dictatorship. People have grown up to get revolted by it and in a way I don't blame them.
How else can we get rid of the elite? Kill them? New ones will pop up. Laws exist but they are not enforced by bought out politicians and beauracrats against the people who do the most damage.
There are other ways like voting libertarian, constitution, green, etc. People should wake up first though!
Al Nour is popular in egypt but after they found out what MB was up to they withdrew their support for them.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Originally posted by MidnightTide
But back to Egypt, as long as the military hold the reigns of power (and is beholden to whoever pays them the most - to back this up after the latest coup Saudi Arabia donates 5 billion to Egypt and suddenly Sharia Law is now in their constitution) essentially the people of Egypt are going to get the raw deal. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
edit on 12-7-2013 by MidnightTide because: (no reason given)
I think it remains to be seen who will succeed morsi as president of egypt and what party.
Jumping to premature conclusions is wrong. The first indications from egypt is that the military supported a popular uprising while Obama and company "seem concerned". When Obozo seems concerned that is usually a badge of honor.
Now the US could get a case of the stupids and pull support from the Egyptian military. That would lead to either another power Russia or China taking over and getting a nice client state right on a shipping route that is vital to US and European interests ...
The US government will delay deliveries of Lockheed Martin F-16 fighters to the government of Egypt, the Pentagon said on 24 July.
"Given the current situation in Egypt, we do not believe it is appropriate to move forward with the delivery of F-16s at this time," the US Department of Defense says.
Under current US law, the country is not legally allowed to provide military aid to foreign governments where the democratically elected leadership has been removed as a result of a military coup. However, the Obama aministration is not calling the removal of Egyptian president Mohamed Morsi by that country's armed forces on 3 July a coup.
"We do not believe it would be in the best interest of the United States to immediately change all of our assistance to Egypt," the Pentagon says. "We are reviewing our obligations under the law and are consulting with Congress about the way forward."
www.amfirstbooks.com...
Confessions of an Arms Peddler
At the age of forty, I had been catapulted from an ordinary government worker into the world's most select group of weapons peddlers, the international negotiators of our government's Department of Defense. There were only sixteen of us, divided into four teams. But we covered every corner of the earth's surface, meeting with representatives of foreign governments and helping them arrange for the purchase of U,S. battle tanks, jet fighters, artillery cannon, bombs and bullets, rifles and mortars. We sold all the marvels of technocracy designed to kill other people or destroy their war-making capabilities.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
reply to post by frazzle
Actually the US is still behind Russia (although neither exports "weapons of mass destruction" as you so lightly call them). It's called a proxy war. Would you rather the US and Russia fought each other, no holds barred?
Originally posted by Zaphod58
reply to post by frazzle
It's hardly the "everyone's doing it" defense. The Russian government has sold millions of weapons and continues to do so. The AK-47 is the most popular gun in the world. Russian helicopters and surface to air systems are all over the Middle East and parts of Asia. You are far more likely to ruin into a Russian system than an American system, unless you are in an American ally nation.