DHS Insider is BACK. This time warning us "It's about to get very ugly"

"DHS Insider", as the internet now knows him, has been a reliable source for the last few months/year or so. He is back this time giving information about the Obama administration and all of the other government officials implicated in the current and future scandals that are about to be [supposedly] exposed.

We all sort of knew this was true, as did Hagmann, in this article but apparently its even worse than any[normal]body thought.

Whats next? Thoughts?

canadafreepress.com...

This administration is collecting names of sources, whistle blowers and their families, names of media sources and everybody they talk to and have talked to, and they already have a huge list. If you’re not working for MSNBC or CNN, you’re probably on that list. If you are a website owner with a brisk readership and a conservative bent, you’re on that list. It’s a political dissident list, not an enemy threat list

If anyone thinks that what’s going on right now with all of this surveillance of American citizens is to fight some sort of foreign enemy, they’re delusional. If people think that this ‘scandal’ can’t get any worse, it will, hour by hour, day by day. This has the ability to bring down our national leadership, the administration and other senior elected officials working in collusion with this administration, both Republican and Democrats.

All this leaks and warnings should be taken advantage off by us the people to force the government into choosing who their serve or face consequences, but if we do not do anything is going to do nothing more but ammunition for laws to protect the crock in government and behind the government to be passed.

Whistle blowers are risking every thing to expose corruption and this is a turning point to take advantage off.

I am just waiting to see when and I will be ready to support whatever.

I think we're seeing, by 20 pt bold headline and world wide, why guys like this aren't credible. If he were who he says he was and knew what he says he does? So would the NSA and he wouldn't be talking a second time.

It's all fine and dandy to pop up once....when no one expects it. Kinda like a gunshot in the woods. The second time? You know direction/bearing and rough distance. The NSA? They know your name and your life right down to your dog's name and what size dump it took in the backyard that morning.

I don't know if I trust any of these 'frequent flier' type sources after starting to see the full and true extent of the surveillance state we're under. It's the single strongest argument against any of them being more than plants to spread carefully seeded legit info with a boat load of bad information to mix.

Interesting.
I can't get the article to load.

reply to post by Wrabbit2000


I wouldn't be so hasty.
I mean, what you say is mostly true, but we don't know their motives.
If their motives and intentions were pure, the Boston bombings would have never happened.

There is always the possibility they WANT certain info to be out.

Whaaaaa??????
I have no idea what I just read but I will never get that time back...some chubby white guy met some other chubby white guy and...what was the point? It was like watching the very news chubbs and son love to hate...

Originally posted by JayinAR
reply to post by Wrabbit2000

 

I wouldn't be so hasty.
I mean, what you say is mostly true, but we don't know their motives.
If their motives and intentions were pure, the Boston bombings would have never happened.

There is always the possibility they WANT certain info to be out.

Now you do bring up the other viable possibility and it's a good one, too. Not all this information turns out to be bunk, even if most leaks like this do. Some seems to pan out, especially in hindsight, right? So, perhaps they are controlled leaks?

I'm just thinking that either way, the impression we're given for these repeat leakers being 100% unknown, safe and spewing really valuable stuff without being caught? Seems highly unlikely. I always suspected the net was tight. I didn't realize until recent revelations just HOW refined the net had become and HOW tight it now is.

I'm not sure I even trust TOR after some of what I'm reading right now. I'm thinking AES 256 is about the only way I'll feel truly comfortable with a sensitive piece of data at the moment.

The democrats are playing a dangerous game with the intelligence community. I think this revelation about the NSA collecting data through Verizon and such is pay back for someone blabbing about the democrats IRS data collection on conservatives and tea party members.

reply to post by eLPresidente


Personally, I think that IS the tip of the iceberg.

I am, however, somewhat puzzled . . . the array of puzzle pieces is pretty complex and too often still mystifying.

I felt before O was Selected that they chose him to destroy the USA as much as he could . . . and that then they'd blame him and make him a scapegoat for doing what they ordered him to do.

Sometimes . . . it seems like they WANT a lot of the conspiracy facts to be outted . . . is that their arrogance--shoving it in our faces ahead of time sort of to say--

"WE WARNED YOU we were going to exterminate you--so you have no excuse to whine when we shove you in the death chambers--we warned you. We were honorable and warned you--you stupid slaves and serfs, you useless eaters--into the wood chippers with the lot of you."

Is it their kind of black humor?

Is it some sort of complex dance where they love to wind up the fear factor tot he max and then fulfill it rather smugly and in their best !CONTROL! freak fashion?

Anyone up for brainstorming what they might be up to with all the conspiracy facts they are allowing out?

BTW, I'm taking a week's fast off from such website reading and posting about 2100 tonight my time. I do hope folks put their minds together, however, and see what conclusions can be ferretted out as to plausible possibilities.

This is about a world war about to break out that will kill millions of people, all because of the agenda of this administration.”

The term "this administration" is what discredits it for me.Truth be told, a lot of the same accusations were made about the Bush admin as well. This isn't to say that both administrations haven't done some diabolical things, as they most certainly have. Point being, this corruption is not exclusive to one admin or ideology. You'll feel the very real threat of an administration that is labeled as Marxist, Communist, Socialist, Muslim, or whatever you like, and they'll slip through the back door privatization of everything. It's a slight of hand, a trick, the same way Oklahoma, 9-11, and Anon served their purpose in getting very restrictive, and not very popular, policies enacted.I'm still not really sure as to why most cannot see it. It's the same game being played over and over again. I guess very little adjustments need to be made because people buy into the charade wholeheartedly every time. Whether this administration is purposefully being set up to fail or fully engaged in this trick isn't really clear. The one thing that is becoming clearer and clearer is the road we're on. The same road we've been on.It's not always what you see that's the real threat. Sometimes it's what you don't see.

Wait a second, what exactly was "DHS Insider" right about so far? Where's the evidence... If I was posting about someone who was right in the past, when leaking information. The first thing I'd do is link that...

reply to post by Wrabbit2000


As I have mentioned in a couple other threads today, I am fairly confident this NSA stuff is a deliberate leak.

And any time someone leaks something anonymously, yet the info withstands the vetting process, yes, I get immediately suspicious the leak is controlled.

Personally I wouldn't deal with sensitive data at all right now.
And that's how they want it.
All goes according to someone's plan.

Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
I think we're seeing, by 20 pt bold headline and world wide, why guys like this aren't credible. If he were who he says he was and knew what he says he does? So would the NSA and he wouldn't be talking a second time.

It's all fine and dandy to pop up once....when no one expects it. Kinda like a gunshot in the woods. The second time? You know direction/bearing and rough distance. The NSA? They know your name and your life right down to your dog's name and what size dump it took in the backyard that morning.

I don't know if I trust any of these 'frequent flier' type sources after starting to see the full and true extent of the surveillance state we're under. It's the single strongest argument against any of them being more than plants to spread carefully seeded legit info with a boat load of bad information to mix.

My thoughts exactly (you probably said it better than I ever could without a few cups of tea).

I don't think these people should ever be completely ignored but they have to be taken with a lot of salt.

No no no guys... listen to this. I need to know, does this mean they administration is planning on covering their tracks?

reply to post by JayinAR


Yes, anonymous is definitely being played here. I don't know why they would intentionally leak that. Although there is one possibility. Someone I talked to over many years at the NSA told me that they were trying to stop Obama.

If the Obama administration has its own ways to gather information outside of the NSA, and they know the NSA has been spying on them, they could take them out this way. If that's the case, it is big trouble.

reply to post by JayinAR


The leaks are real I have not doubt about that, but what you have been missing is how the Obama administration has gone like a ravid dog after whistle blowers and how has used the IRS, the distric attorney (that actually warned the President about violation of constitutional rights and freedom of the media) and the NSA to do just that.

I don't think this new leaks are controlled, for the contrair it looks to me retaliation against the Obama administration for been so hateful of whistle blowers, the timing is perfect amidthe scandals been going on lately.

reply to post by darkbake


Wait...what?? Can you elaborate a bit, by chance? How trustworthy is your friend? (No offense meant...but I gotta ask, you know?) What sort of intel group could a political arm have outside of the "normal" infrastructure of NSA, etc?

reply to post by marg6043


Except I haven't missed any of that stuff.
I pay pretty close attention to this stuff, believe it or not.