It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by HomerinNC
That's a mighty big assumption to make in saying every 18yr old male in the United States who has screwed with his girlfriend after her turned precisely 18...has seen a criminal prosecution over it.
Rather than call for the head of the girl here in some retribution to wrongs gone by, we ought to seriously question why males EVER get criminal charges within a true girl/boy friend relationship and they're both school age? Just my two cents...but two wrongs never make anything right and it's as wrong against males as it is against this previously excellent student (going by her record as stated).
Originally posted by chiefsmom
reply to post by HomerinNC
What high school did you go to?
Maybe it's just different here in MI. 18 year old High school males very rarely get charged here for a consensual relationship with a freshman girl.
Originally posted by HomerinNC
reply to post by MichaelPMaccabee
Then your alleged comments that they were both underage when the relationship started is false and invalid if you cant post your source
Matthew Freeman is struggling to move on with his life, six years after being convicted of having sex with a high school girlfriend who was one year below the legal age of consent.
Freeman told the trooper he was on the Michigan Sex Offender Registry because he had “sex with his 15-year-old girlfriend when he was 17.” He also said his girlfriend’s mother got “upset with him and pressed charges.”
Originally posted by grey580
Two Words.
Jury Nullification.
That's all you need to know.
Next!
Originally posted by MichaelPMaccabee
Originally posted by HomerinNC
reply to post by MichaelPMaccabee
Then your alleged comments that they were both underage when the relationship started is false and invalid if you cant post your source
Actually, if you want to get logical about it..
They are both true AND false until the facts come out.
en.wikipedia.org...'s_cat
You can't claim my information is false simply because I wont give you the source. You can choose not to believe them and that's fine. However your ignorance is willful as I have given you the tools to find this information on your own.
The girls were 18 and 14 when they became sexually involved, according to an arrest affidavit by the county Sheriff's Department.
Originally posted by DaTroof
14 year olds have no idea what they want. The 18 year old is clearly manipulative. I have no problem with the resolution.
Originally posted by defuntion
Originally posted by MichaelPMaccabee
The girl's were 17 and 15 when this started, not 18 and 14.
The parents didn't file charges until she was 18 to ensure she would be tried as an adult. The ages are important because Florida has an age proximity clause in its consent laws.
This probably wont go to trial.edit on 22-5-2013 by MichaelPMaccabee because: (no reason given)
No. That is not what the article says....
Straight from the OP's article source:
The girls were 18 and 14 when they became sexually involved, according to an arrest affidavit by the county Sheriff's Department.
Why are people trying to make excuses?
Originally posted by mblahnikluver
Kate was NOT 18!!
The parents of the other girl are doing this for the wrong reasons, it's pathetic they can't accept their daughter and want to ruin another girls life because of their own religious beliefs. It's BS.