It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JayinAR
I am having a hard time understanding the point of your video in relation to this thread.
Are you saying, as Colonel French has said, that the ice particle explanation for STS anomalies is an attempt to throw together a debunk that pacifies our curiosity?......
You tell me Jim, your the Debunker.
Originally posted by Tw0Sides
Apply the same standard, say, to human levitation, or communicating with the dead, or immortal humans, or leprechauns. What does the mass quantity of such stories -- varying in different epochs -- mean about the chance of a single ONE of them being true?
Sure there are Over Zealous reports, granted.
But Reports from Cops, Presidents, Pilots, Air Traffic Controllers, Astronauts .
Must be Nice to be you, Always the Smartest One in the Room.
Originally posted by JayinAR
reply to post by FearYourMind
So, if we have a prosaic explanation for how these things happen, why on earth would we leap to conclusions that the others are anything BUT what we know to have happened in the 48 footage? It is silly.
Originally posted by JayinAR
A thread I can't find?
That's the point, isn't it? You are bringing stuff to the table that has been discussed countless times before. I am not doing your research for you.
It is clear that you want to believe regardless of what anyone may say. Hell, you have a guy in here who's job is to monitor these very cameras!
I'm done here.
None of the ice crystal explanation makes sense.
Originally posted by InhaleExhale
reply to post by FearYourMind
None of the ice crystal explanation makes sense.
Why does it not make sense?
Have you tried making sense of it, or just went after watching some You Tube?
Originally posted by FearYourMind
Originally posted by InhaleExhale
reply to post by FearYourMind
None of the ice crystal explanation makes sense.
Why does it not make sense?
Have you tried making sense of it, or just went after watching some You Tube?
I've explained over and over why it doesn't make sense. Also, it's not just "some YouTube video", the abundance of footage has been around since before YouTube and it's official NASA footage.
I refuse nothing!...Oberg gets more info & he needs even more...then more..pathetic technique, changing goalposts...just lazy...
Originally posted by JimOberg
Originally posted by silversurfer6161
For those who are really interested ,there are some very good NASA videos on Marty Stubbs' YouTube channel.
Of the multitude of objects floating around(ice crystals,dust etc),you will find some in these videos that you can't explain.Accept it and go from there.....
Since Stubbs refuses to provide basic context such as date/time, he cleverly prevents any way to independently validate the videos. It's a trick, why are you such a willing victim?