posted on May, 15 2013 @ 10:38 PM
Originally posted by cass1dy09
... and all though he doesn't always make a convincing case in debates, he can always hold his own.
He's a pastor and goes from college to college debating atheist students.
One cant help but wonder why he doesnt *always* win.
He is, after all, a professional debater, taking on amateur students.
Secondly, because he's on the side of religion (where facts dont matter and its all about belief), going up against atheism (where evidence, data,
and facts matter), I'm stunned that in a debate situation he cant rule. Always.
If I wanted to win a religion vs. atheism argument, I'd always...
- choose the "religion" side
- choose a time limited debate.
Much like the creationsim vs evolution discussion. In writing, creationism always gets stomped on, but in a time limited debate the creationst can
just make stuff up off the top of their head and win.