Accused Boston Bombers Plotted Attack in NYC, Police Say

Accused Boston Bombers Plotted Attack in NYC, Police Say

abcnews.go.com

The brothers Tsarnaev had plans to drive to New York in their carjacked Mercedes and explode their remaining bombs last Thursday, but their plans went off track when the owner of the car they stole made an escape, law enforcement sources told ABC News.

(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
www.myfoxny.com
www.nbcnewyork.com
online.wsj.com

were they going to party or to attack manhatten.
suspect # 2 first said party, then was said to change his story to that his brother wanted to go and use the rest of his bombs.

the owner said he heeard them talking about manhattan but could understand everything.

wonder just what is the truth.

there is a news briefing, coming up shortly, bloomberg has held a prees confrence once this morning.

additional links

abcnews.go.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

Bloomberg in that press conference said the FBI notified them they had plans to attack Times Square with as many as 6 IED's.

Mainstream just broadcast a few minutes of Bloombergs press conference.

So the Tsarnaev brothers were not finished.

Lots of drone talk in the news...seems to me like the MSM and Big Govt are using this event to build a case/sensitize the public to 1) martial law and 2) using drones to kill US citizens on US soil....if the alleged goes into your house, they'll use a drone to blow up you and your family, just like they do in Pakistan.

No they weren't. Now the government and media is just making up a bunch of hearsay to make them look like the big scary boogeymen terrorists that they so desperately need you to believe. They were planning this, they were planing that, whatever. The only ones planning any terrorism is the FBI and CIA. The two brothers were under their control, after all.

This kid is singing like a bird.

Originally posted by Merlin Lawndart
No they weren't. Now the government and media is just making up a bunch of hearsay to make them look like the big scary boogeymen terrorists that they so desperately need you to believe. They were planning this, they were planing that, whatever. The only ones planning any terrorism is the FBI and CIA. The two brothers were under their control, after all.

Lots of folks who "hate government" also seem to trust msm a little too much. I don't think they realise the scope and depth of the deception the elite are willing to take to accomplish this rfid chip and digital currency society. I am speaking of both neoliberals and neoconservatives.

Fear is the weapon of choice. Blame it all on "terrorists" whether it be christian fundamentalists or muslim fundamentalists. Also keep the mcarthy witchunt alive for as long as possible because too many people died fighting the spread of socialism instead of fighting the spread of state capitalism.

The biggest red flag of all is the near martial law conditions in boston for two days for just two suspects.

Bloomberg is a psychopath, completely out of touch with society and people in general, he is also one of the standing commanders to one of the largest armed paramilitary forces in the entire world, the NYPD.

This is really not a joke, and people should not take lightly what this man has to say about "drones", the constitution, policy changes or "martial law-esque" operations.

In my opinion, he is on the fast track to becoming an actual tyrant.

I'll make it simple: Late evening on 24 April 2013 it is revealed that White Hat Guy was unarmed when arrested. This exposed a HUGE LIE by Law Enforcement who had stated that White Hat Guy was firing at police from the boat.

Now suddenly today, 25 April 2013 White Hat Guy being unarmed and LE lies SHOULD have been the big story of focus for the day. In order to take the public's focus off of LE lies (they lied about him being armed, what else might they lie about?) and needed something major to distract the media and the public. Enter Michael Bloomberg.

On 24 April 2013 it was widely reported that the Brothers were headed to NYC to "party" and likely hideout under the radar. On 25 April 2013 Bloomberg who loves the spotlight more than anyone decided that "party" in NYC must really mean attack NYC with Times Square being the most well-known place in the City. So Bloomberg saw an opportunity to take the focus off Boston's LE lies by grandstanding by using rumor and speculation and saying it is fact. This shouldn't surprise anyone who knows that Bloomberg wants nothing more than to limit Constitutional rights of American citizens.

With no weapons besides one alleged handgun, no more bombs (they allegedly detonated one during the "shootout" and LE has not officially stated other devices had been recovered from the scene) and no money how were they going to attack the largest city in the world? It does not add up logically.

Bloomberg's scare tactics are preposterous and must be stopped.

Also, all the reports of leaked info that media outlets are reporting should be taken with a grain of salt because: The number of people who know exactly what went on in that hospital room is so small and that group would keep a very tight seal on the real info.

Given the extraordinary amount of leaked alleged statements of White Hat Guy, it is safe to say that 80% of these reports are utter rubbish.

reply to post by NickDC202


Couldn't have said it any better really.

I wish I could put up a thread detailing every single lie, every story-twist, everything that has been proved false.. but it would literally take days. Without exaggeration -- nearly every piece of "information" regarding this case has been found lacking or nonexistent.

It is sick really, and as I said about Bloomberg standing over one of the world's largest armed forces... its troubling to say the least. This should be very serious, and someone needs to put a leash on this man, yesterday.

reply to post by guymontag


Thanks guymontag.

What I didn't include in my initial post was the most interesting things that the fabrication of a Times Square plot is distracting the public from:

The US Economy is so bad that the $2 Trillion Underground Economy May Be Recovery's Savior and keep us from collapse

Internet sales tax has Republican support, vote expected

What an Internet Sales Tax Could Mean for Your Bitcoin Stash (Spoiler: Eliminate Bitcoin's anonimity)

Is the U.S. economy in trouble?

Thousands of firefighters in Waco for West explosion memorial (Oddly this is getting ZERO coverage; WHY?)

ACLU: CISPA Is Dead For Now (An unexpected CISPA development; could have easily gone the other way)

U.S. believes Syria used chemical weapons (Someone must think that we DO NEED to go to war)

Officials say surviving bomb suspect unarmed when captured hiding inside boat

Any of the above is more worthy and much more important to the public to be made aware of; any of them merits "Top Story" designation by the news media; instead of those important issues the public instead hears wall-to-wall coverage about a plot to bomb NYC that never existed...

reply to post by NickDC202


I do agree with you there. I think officials are leading this kid to say what they want him to say. He's scared, ashamed and just trying to save his own life.

And, of course, only revealing to the media what they want to be heard.

Originally posted by Rosegaol

It is quite troubling that:
- The American public has found these two guilty without being presented "some" evidence.

- While the media rumor mill is flourishing with discussion of a video showing each suspect planting the bombs yet no one has seen it and it has not been shown to the public (not even a photo of them doing this)

- Absolutely no information establishing a link between the brothers and the officer killed at MIT has been shared.

- There has not been any official statements detailing any devices that were set off and/or recovered from the scene of the alleged shootout.

- The media and government officials don't focus on how their own agencies failure to take action when clear red flags were raised to them about Black Hat Guy is what allowed these attacks to happen; instead they choose to focus on how restricting our rights will keep us safe.

And what do people make of the Glenn Beck discovery of the saudi national whom it is hinted by fox news as being the "real perpetrator" of the attacks? I think it is smoke and mirrors personally. Probably a sub-plot that has some validity taken out of context to cover-up the craft/blackwater conspiracy.

This is what I refer to people whom seem to think fox news is above the cut in terms of msm credibility. They are good at *controlled opposition*, I will give them that much credit.

reply to post by EarthCitizen07


Honestly, regardless of their politics, I make it a policy avoid acknowledging alleged inside info or investigative findings shared by former radio morning zoo hosts...

Originally posted by NickDC202
reply to post by EarthCitizen07

 

Honestly, regardless of their politics, I make it a policy avoid acknowledging alleged inside info or investigative findings shared by former radio morning zoo hosts...

By ignoring disinformation it does not make it go away.

At least we appear to be on the same side!

if LA gets hit on saturday everyones going to # their pants

I do believe you've hit the proverbial nail on the head...Bloomberg's lies were a smokescreen for the fact that the suspect in the boat was unarmed...mainstream media is part of the real coverup.

My only question:

What's the difference between this incident and recent The Aurora shooting/ Newton shootings? Other then the fact that those are not labeled as Terror incidents, why does this one have so much info being leaked?

Why are details from those two first incidents basically all but closed to the public, but this one is not? It seems everyday a new piece of info is released to the media, and they push it so hard, while skirting around a recently released (mostly) wrong press reports, again from these same insider sources.

All of these reports are being released on the word of unnamed inside sources. Unnamed sources that are not on the record have no recourse to sell off false info.

Why is this being considering trustworthy, and not what it technically is, hearsay?

Everyone's main concern should be that with every new tidbit of information, the idea of a fair trial from an opinionated jury is fleeting. When you add with that, the delay on Miranda, they are opening a GIANT hole for the suspect to get through with a savy enough lawyer.

The suspect is talking, but the only picture the public has seen is one that looks like he is comatose. Where are the new photos of him alert in fair condition? Why no picture?

The only difference here is we have a Mayor holding a press conference on info obtained from an inside source. How does that make it more credible?