Coming to your TV screen starting on November 11th 2013 a ten part series hosted and produced by Tom Hanks that will be an apologia, like no other,
sparing no expense, to the Warren Commission, and their conclusions.
Legend has that it all started by the 7 year old daughter of one of the early staff members of the AARB. The Assassination Records Review Board was
the creature that was the result of the JFK act signed by President Clinton, in response to the Film 'JFK' directed by much hated in Hollywood
director Oliver Stone. According to the legend a staffer was using his home computer to examine the digitally enhanced frames of the Zapruder film
that were reproduced from the 'official" film from the safe at the National Archive in Washington DC. Supposedly, the young girl pointed to the
screen and said "Daddy whats that pink thing".
I assume the response was something like "Honey that is Jackie's-Mrs. Kennedy's-pillbox pink hat". "Why is the sign so messed up then? That was
followed up by "go to your room child" or something similar.
These are compare photos of frames 208 and 214 of the 'Official" US Government copy of the film that has never left the jurisdiction of the
government. We, as citizens, own a master copy of the film taken that day in 1963 and it has been altered and only our government could have done it
as they(The FBI) were in sole possession since 2:30pm on the afternoon of November 22nd 1963. It was processed in a CIA lab somewhere in the
Washington DC area-that is all that is known.
The how and why, and by who, are as mysterious as any mystery can get. Doug Horne's 2000 large page dissemination of the AARB, in 5 volumes, tries to
explain the photographic techniques of 16mm film that were in order in the 1960's. However even he admits he too is lost in a world of
mattes/transparency/split edge development and countless other outer world jargon that simply, at best 2 or 3 dozen people, in the entire country
The why is the easiest to explain as the desperation, at that moment, must have been pressing as no one ever expected an executive of a dress
manufacturing company to take such a clear and damning movie of something that happened so fast(9 seconds) and surprised everyone by it's bloody,
horrifying graphic nature.
Only the ensuing months leading up to this production will clue interest in people who haven't spent (or wasted) 30 years or more keeping up with all
that has gone on behind the scenes in a 'real' American government conspiracy- of which the truth will, most likely, never be given the light of
All of this-digital frames of the film and over 2 million documents can be studied at the Mary Ferrell Foundation and I will add that only those of us
who need print access and other, deeper parts of the database, must pay the $99.00 to $109.00 fee. It's free to anyone to see and read everything
about the most complex 9 seconds in World history.
As a note I'm (obviously) not very skilled at posting anything on any internet forum and I tried my best with these photos. I don't have the
slightest idea, nor does anyone else I know, why the Stemmons freeway sign ended up being altered, as it most certainly has been. Perhaps someone here
who understands 1960's 16mm film technology can address what has gone on here. Jackie's hat simply can't be at the place it appears unless she was
9 foot tall and few dispute that. The Government had admitted the film has been altered and practice the art of playing ostrich as only they can do.
Honestly, I don't think there is anyone left alive that was involved, or perhaps assisted, in the alteration of the film.
About the angle in which Mr Hanks-writer Stephen King is also involved-plans to take in his series I don't know except that a destruction of Oliver
Stone's film (which is a load of baseless speculation, convincingly invented characters and theatrical mastery) will be top billing.