Erased tapes of the Moon landing - Any News?

page: 3
9
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join

posted on Apr, 7 2013 @ 10:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by wildespace

Originally posted by EricR
A satellite passing by, snapping pictures from massive distances, gives us zero detail that can be counted as proof IMHO.


You call this zero detail?

www.nasa.gov...

That's Apollo 15 site at resolution of 40cm/pixel.

Here's one of Apollo 17 at the whooping 25cm/pixel:
wms.lroc.asu.edu...

Lots more here: www.nasa.gov...
edit on 7-4-2013 by wildespace because: (no reason given)


Those are just rocks




posted on Apr, 7 2013 @ 10:34 PM
link   
Ok, so I apologize if this sounds stupid, did they even have the tech to record to tape at that time?



posted on Apr, 7 2013 @ 11:27 PM
link   
Another example of erasing tapes to reuse them is that the BBC erased all of the original Doctor Who episodes of the 1960's. That is even more tragic.



posted on Apr, 7 2013 @ 11:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by wildespace

Originally posted by EricR
A satellite passing by, snapping pictures from massive distances, gives us zero detail that can be counted as proof IMHO.


You call this zero detail?

www.nasa.gov...

That's Apollo 15 site at resolution of 40cm/pixel.

Here's one of Apollo 17 at the whooping 25cm/pixel:
wms.lroc.asu.edu...

Lots more here: www.nasa.gov...






I can't make out any relevant details. Can you?

I can't see how anyone could consider that as useful proof. It might just as well be a picture of a '57 chevy on a lunar movie set for all the detail available.



posted on Apr, 7 2013 @ 11:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by olaru12


If NASA's past record on disclosure and openness is any indication of their intent.....

I'll chose the conspiracy most of the time.

N...never
A...a
S...straight
A...answer

I don't pay taxes to buy lies!!!






Paying taxes to buy lies is pretty much all we have been doing for the last 50 years. At least they used to hang their head in shame and lie about it.

Now, they steal from us, oppress us and foreign lands and don't even bother to lie about it. They control every office that could hold them accountable.



posted on Apr, 8 2013 @ 01:44 AM
link   
reply to post by ctdannyd
 


been around since the early 1950's Linky



posted on Apr, 8 2013 @ 01:58 AM
link   
reply to post by EricR
 


Tardacus/EricR
Strange how you were quick to comment on wildespcace's post of the LRO picture
but no comment on this.



I think we all know why


Top half taken by Apollo 17 crew as they left the Moon
Bottom half from the LRO taken 40 years later.
Even the tracks match!!!

Now because the LRO cameras are 50 cm /pixel resolution or even 26 cm/pixel on low orbits you can match VERY small features seen on the pictures the Astronauts took on the surface.

You can also check distances between objects as they are documented as well



posted on Apr, 8 2013 @ 04:36 AM
link   
Stinky old NASA and their massive swamp of lies.



posted on Apr, 8 2013 @ 07:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by Tardacus
Those are just rocks


Originally posted by EricR
I can't make out any relevant details. Can you?


You guys are funny. You can see foot tracks left by the astronauts, and the double tracks from the LRV they were driving around. The descent stages can be made out fairly well on different photos, which were taken at different sun angles. Many rocks and craters seen in Apollo photos can be matched to those seen in LRO photos.

Have a look at this link, and go through the "Flip Books" there, which allow you to see the same Apollo site at different sun angles: featured-sites.lroc.asu.edu...
Descent stages are easily recognised by their shape and the shape of their shadow.




This site examines matching features between Apollo and LRO images: onebigmonkey.comoj.com...
More matching features: forums.randi.org...
edit on 8-4-2013 by wildespace because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 8 2013 @ 08:10 AM
link   
This can't be true. If it was it would be like Obama doing something weird with his birth certificate. Wait....



posted on Apr, 8 2013 @ 08:23 AM
link   
was video even used back then? I thought it was all 35 mm file
you can't erase film..



posted on Apr, 8 2013 @ 10:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by Maxatoria
reply to post by ctdannyd
 


been around since the early 1950's Linky


Hmmm, I see that, but they look kind of bulky, and it was quite expensive to transport weight from Earth to orbit, and on to the Moon.

The technology of today I could see very easily being used, but back then, I don't think it was quite so easy.



posted on Apr, 8 2013 @ 10:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by rockymcgilicutty
reply to post by Xenoglossy
 


I would like to know which conspiracy you are hinting at.

1 The U.S landed on the Moon ( in which case you shoot down 1 conspiracy #3 )

2 The U.S landed on the Moon and surppressed evidence of aliens. ( which again shoots down #3 )

3 The U.S never landed on the Moon. ( then you destroy the 2 above conspiracies)

4 The U.S is hiding evidence of alien bases on the moon ( this theory fails to include all other countries that have photographed the surface of the moon, and astronomers both professional and amature who are able to see the surface of the moon)

Pick one it's all a conspiracy I tell you.


Option #2 looks like best choice.

Neil Armstrong said the alien ships were huge and menacing.

They have a Luna Base on the other side of the moon. They are after the Helium 3 to

generate power. The Domain prefers low gravity celestial bodies.



posted on Apr, 8 2013 @ 02:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by TauCetixeta
Neil Armstrong said the alien ships were huge and menacing.

Source? Link to interview? Anything?


Originally posted by TauCetixeta
They have a Luna Base on the other side of the moon. They are after the Helium 3 to

generate power. The Domain prefers low gravity celestial bodies.

I'll just assume the source is the same "Alien Interview" science-fiction book you already recommended.


jra

posted on Apr, 8 2013 @ 02:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by acacko
was video even used back then? I thought it was all 35 mm file
you can't erase film..


Of course they have video. How else do you think it was possible to broadcast live from the Moon? You can't do that with film. They mostly used video, but they also have some 16mm film with the DAC, but that was much more limited.

Apollo TV camera
edit on 8-4-2013 by jra because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 8 2013 @ 03:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by ctdannyd

Originally posted by Maxatoria
reply to post by ctdannyd
 


been around since the early 1950's Linky


Hmmm, I see that, but they look kind of bulky, and it was quite expensive to transport weight from Earth to orbit, and on to the Moon.

The technology of today I could see very easily being used, but back then, I don't think it was quite so easy.


On the Moon, they had the TV cameras. The video signal was transmitted to Earth, where it was recorded.

This is the link you need: en.wikipedia.org...
edit on 8-4-2013 by wildespace because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 15 2013 @ 04:33 AM
link   

Originally posted by wildespace


This site examines matching features between Apollo and LRO images: onebigmonkey.comoj.com...
More matching features: forums.randi.org...
edit on 8-4-2013 by wildespace because: (no reason given)




The "matching features" were taken by Apollo moon rovers, not by men on the moon.
edit on 15-4-2013 by Ove38 because: link fix





top topics
 
9
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join