Vaccines produce homosexuality, says Italian scientist

I do not agree completely but I do not deny the possibilities of chemical influence on the human physiology and hormones. There are birth defects, social issues and traumas in addition to hormonal reasons for folks being selective about their sexual partners IMO. Needless to say, more research needs to be done to prove this particular Italian Scientist's theory right.

PS: Is that why 'Farookh Bulsara' AKA Freddie Mercury chose the alternative entertainment industry name ?

Originally posted by Xeven
I do think being homosexual is an abnormal or unatural state of being, like being born with Autism or Aspergers etc...

WTF

I have a buddy who's gay. When I met him, I never knew he was. There were no stereo-typical feminine movements, or dressing different, or talking with a lisp, or higher pitch. You'd have never known.

Well it was a while before I found out from other friends he was gay (which at the time I guess due to the culture I grew up in, was not cool and made me against it). Anyway this guy would give you the shirt off his back, last dollar in his pocket, feed the homeless, etc.

When I found out he was gay, I asked him if it was true .....(cause you know how rumors go!!!) and he said he was. He said he was molested by an uncle as a kid and that ever since then, he was gay and that's it. He said he hated being gay and that it was like a disease in his psychology that he couldn't get rid of. He tried psychologists, church, repression, a solitary life, and tried women, but said the gay aspects always came back.

He's accepted that he is the way he is, but told me he wished he was normal like the rest of our male friends.

Makes me wonder about what this scientist is saying.

I also figured that gay males used to be females in a past life, and vice versa, and that the BPA and toxins in our modern environment also have an effect on the development and eventual sexuality of a fetus

Originally posted by rickymouse

Originally posted by Skywatcher2011

Originally posted by rickymouse
This is possible, deciding if it is probable is another story. I am sure there has been little if no testing done on whether the vaccine can effect a persons sexual preferences. What testing is done is usually on short term effects.

But if animals get tested using vaccines first before the medication goes to humans, wouldn't there be a lot of gay animals (rats, cats, dogs, etc...) by now?

I'm sure that the scientists studying this are going to be asking the rats, cats, dogs, etc if they are gay

You have to look for something to see it, are they looking for signs of sexual preference in these animals.....I doubt if it was even thought of.

I can't discount something for lack of evidence if it has never been researched for that reason. This may be a delusion of a seventy year old man but it could also be real.

edit on 2-4-2013 by rickymouse because: (no reason given)

Actually when scientists are conducting certain experimental protocols in-vivo (animal testing), one of the major attributions to a test report are clinical observations, (which are conducted normally on a twice daily basis or more depending on the study protocol).

Part of these clinical observations are to observe atypic animal behaviour (including sexual activity)(these observations are conducted in both Gvt and private labs under the guidelines layed out to them by the country where the experimental protocols are being carried out)).

If you need more info on that just Google "Guidelines for clinical observations in laboratory animals" or use one of the keys words.

Kindest respects

Rodinus

reply to post by Xeven

homosexual is an abnormal or unatural state of being, like being born with Autism or Aspergers etc...

I would not call it unnatural, the expression is natural and has been around for ages, but the reason behind it is unknown. Which is what we should be discussing, not the right or wrong of homosexuality.

I would not compare it with those diseases you mentioned, however the chemical balance(for attraction) might be expressed in homosexuals in a different manner than a heterosexual, which results in their type of attraction for same sex.

I would say it is all in the gene expression.

reply to post by ballymoney50


Or homosexuality amongst other animals in the animal kingdom, besides humans.

reply to post by Skittle


yes that to

reply to post by ManFromEurope


Homosexuality is not a "disease" but a dysfunction, it happens in nature and often is beyond simpler sexual orientation, cultural dogmas and open sexuality, it is indeed the feminization of the brain and this is done by hormones allied with genetic predisposition (like everything else).

There is a study that I have never seen opposed that found that women that have several children generate antibodies against the male chromosome, elevating the chance off it affecting the development of a second male child.

There is also a link between homosexuality and industrialization that goes beyond simple demographics and social openness. It has to do with pollution I doubt the theory on vaccines but it serves as an example on how polluted our lives are today....

I have nothing against homosexuality as it occurs naturally and everyone should be free to exert his/hers sexuality as they wish if not violating anyone else's freedoms. I do however feel that homosexuals have started to have too much control in shaping culture and forcing a specific political discourse, this is seen in movies, tv series etc and even in the metro-sexual meme that is resulting in real oppression for the other side of the table. Some counter response is just normal after the decades of persecution but its starting to become overbearing and overrepresented as it continues to be minority.