The following US Senators Just Committed Treason and Should Be Arrested Immediately!

page: 4
76
<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in

join

posted on Mar, 25 2013 @ 01:26 PM
link   
I've been saying it for a long time now, that arrest warrants need to be issued for the traitorous scum and the people(tax payers) need to enforce the warrants and escort the traitors to the jail. Sen. Rockefeller is a zionist traitor of the highest order and comes from the biggest zionist resource theiving family ever known. After what his grandfather did to W.Va., I always thought it odd how he became sen. of W.va., then it dawned on me at a very young age; He was appointed, not by the people, but his criminal family. They just keep holding the door open for each other and keeping out anyone with a conscience. Isn't that the very definition of evil?




posted on Mar, 25 2013 @ 02:04 PM
link   
reply to post by Gazrok
 


Mr. Inhofes amendment should have reflected that.




He claims that the Arms Trade Treaty, cedes power to the United Nations over our decisions of who we trade arms with.

1. Trade has nothing whatsoever to do with the 2nd Amendment.
2. The treaty does no such thing.
3. It isn't even remotely possible to cede any power of any kind to the UN.


SA 139. Mr. INHOFE submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the concurrent resolution S. Con. Res. 8, setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2014, revising the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal year 2013, and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2015 through 2023; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:

At the end of title III, add the following:

SEC. 3__. DEFICIT-NEUTRAL RESERVE FUND TO UPHOLD SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS AND PREVENT THE UNITED STATES FROM ENTERING INTO THE UNITED NATIONS ARMS TRADE TREATY.

The Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the Senate may revise the allocations of a committee or committees, aggregates, and other appropriate levels in this resolution for one or more bills, joint resolutions, amendments, motions, or conference reports that relate to upholding Second Amendment rights, which shall include preventing the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty, by the amounts provided in such legislation for those purposes, provided that such legislation would not increase the deficit or revenues over either the period of the total of fiscal years 2013 through 2018 or the period of the total of fiscal years 2013 through 2023.


Deficit neutral may ass and it was a nice little power grab to boot.

link



posted on Mar, 25 2013 @ 02:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by Gazrok

True, but it is the perception that they will use this pie
ce of crap to further push the banning of guns in America...it's the PRINCIPLE of this that is objectionable


You are so right that is not funny, no only that, even when we keep telling ourselves that an foreign arm treaty with the UN will never infringe in the constitutional rights of America and that the supreme court will do its job to protect that right, it is a loophole that while unthinkable is very real, depending how bad certain political groups foreign and domestic wants to crap on the American second amendment.

Unthinkable, yes, impossible no.



posted on Mar, 25 2013 @ 03:00 PM
link   
reply to post by Kali74
 


All laws and treaties have loopholes.

The UN Arms Trade Treaty & Our Constitution’s Loophole

iapcar.org...

like I say unthinkable, yes, impossible no.

We are in the final stages of a global power grab, that the only thing that is affecting this power grab is that pesky US constitution, sadly this no new it has been in the making even before the last two generations were born.



posted on Mar, 25 2013 @ 04:37 PM
link   
reply to post by Argyll
 


First, thank you for respectfully joining the debate. Yes they are allowed to have their own opinion. However, they are elected to represent us in making decisions in our name. However, the 2nd Amendment is not something that is up for debate. We should not have to have to waste our time telling these idiots that it's not up for debate. Contrary to what you may hear these traitors try and say, the 2nd Amendment was written to provide the citizenry with the means to defend ourselves from criminals or a tyrannical government. It is not there for hunting, sports, or cultural purposes. If we loose the 2nd Amendment, then the rest of the Bill of Rights becomes moot. They should already know that. So IMO, it is traitorous for them to vote on a bill that would would have effectively told Obama and Kerry to tell the UN to shove the Small Arms treaty up there fourth point of contact. These people are not stupid and swore the same oath that I did, to uphold the Constitution of US, and in my case my oath included: against all enemies foreign or domestic!



posted on Mar, 25 2013 @ 04:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by marg6043
reply to post by Signals
 


Thank you, thank you, thank you, exactly that is my point also, while our Constitution is protected on its own people have not clue that when it comes to this treaties loopholes are not patched to protect the rights to gun and to uphold US Constitution as a priority.


Nothing need be done. It is settled law the the Constitution overrules treaties.

And how many divisions does the UN have?

edit on 25-3-2013 by mbkennel because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 25 2013 @ 05:29 PM
link   
Well, I don't belive it but I am glad NOT to see the 2 senators from Alabama on that list.



posted on Mar, 25 2013 @ 06:21 PM
link   
None from Texas...

Once again, I say make the move down here, get an AR and ammo and then you'll be helping the cause, not by making threads on ATS.
edit on 25-3-2013 by Redwhiteandblue because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 25 2013 @ 06:58 PM
link   
Tom udall just got an email.



posted on Mar, 25 2013 @ 07:09 PM
link   
The day the UN creates laws in our country will be the last day I am an American. At that point we will be somtihng else, a world citizen. People need to start speaking up about this issue. We need to protest even more, it has to be bigger than the G8 protest.



posted on Mar, 25 2013 @ 07:14 PM
link   
reply to post by marg6043
 


A lot of Laws have loopholes, a lot of treaties have loopholes. Some treaties can be held up by international law and in some cases breach of treaty can result facing the International Court, which is part of the Charter of the UN


The Court's workload covers a wide range of judicial activity. To date, the ICJ has dealt with relatively few cases. However, since the 1980s there has been a clear increase in willingness to use the Court, especially among developing countries. After the court ruled that the U.S.'s covert war against Nicaragua was in violation of international law (Nicaragua v. United States), the United States withdrew from compulsory jurisdiction in 1986. The United States accepts the court's jurisdiction only on a case-by-case basis.[3]


There is no loophole big enough or convoluted enough to make the United States bend or submit to the will of the UN. How on earth would they ever force us to comply with anything we don't want to. They would have to declare war on us, and how would they do that without our military?

This is in addition to the absolute FACT, that no law, not even our own, trumps the Constitution. The US courts would have to be complicit in trumping the Constitution, by ruling something contended, Constitutional... in which case the last thing we'd be needing to worry about is an outside enemy, let alone one as impotent as the UN.



posted on Mar, 25 2013 @ 07:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by Signals

The most egregious affront to the sovereignty of the United States is that there is not a single word in the Arms Trade Treaty protecting the unalienable right to keep and bear arms. In fact, the latest draft of the proposed agreement only recognizes private ownership of firearms for “recreational, cultural, historical, and sporting activities.” This is a significant and unacceptable infringement on the rights protected by the Second Amendment.


www.infowars.com...


check if article 51 has been done away with in the UN charter...i found that it was not.... article 51 provides for self-protection with arms in sovereign nations by it's citizens



posted on Mar, 25 2013 @ 07:53 PM
link   
reply to post by jimmyx
 


Not to mention this:


Principles
Guided by the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations,
States Parties, in promoting the object and purpose of this Treaty and implementing
its provisions, shall act in accordance with the following principles:

1. The inherent right of all States to individual or collective self-defence;



UN Arms Trade Treaty



posted on Mar, 25 2013 @ 08:01 PM
link   
reply to post by Kali74
 


States?

We have God-given INDIVIDUAL rights, nothing to do with states or governments



posted on Mar, 25 2013 @ 08:03 PM
link   
as a follow up...i'm alittle comcerned with the language on transfer of arms from country to country. it seems that would want a "register" of tranfer...so..if you wanted a firearm made in another country sent here it would be registered in a UN database.



posted on Mar, 25 2013 @ 08:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by Signals
reply to post by Kali74
 


States?

We have God-given INDIVIDUAL rights, nothing to do with states or governments


please, you don't have a GOD-GIVEN second amendment right...it's a man-made right, which by the way for those who are getting ready to flame me, i believe in the second amendment



posted on Mar, 25 2013 @ 08:12 PM
link   
So what are we as individuals supposed to do???? The people who "check and balance" our government are ALL corrupted its foolish to say they aren't. What as human beings are we supposed to Do?! every senator congressman president you name it is protected by its own entity so how are we supposed to stop something that can't be stopped.

I highly doubt any of us including myself would drop my whole life problems job family issues anything to justify our means. It is a battle that needs troops but us the troops won't fight we are 2 envelopeD in the system.

if we had a plan if we had a motive a clear set motive what would it be. How do we overcome something that's more powerful than it has ever been?



posted on Mar, 25 2013 @ 08:17 PM
link   
I appreciate the theory of what you say and do NOT like at all that they would attempt that sneaky move.

However, since when has the US followed any treaties.

UDHR? Human rights is a big US thing right? No. We dont follow that at all. There are treaties which we did sing and still dont follow.

Not saying its right. Just saying the teeth of a treaty is unfortunately dull.



posted on Mar, 25 2013 @ 08:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by Signals
reply to post by Kali74
 


States?

We have God-given INDIVIDUAL rights, nothing to do with states or governments


God gave you no kind of rights. These rights were written by man.



posted on Mar, 25 2013 @ 08:23 PM
link   
reply to post by jimmyx
 


Okay, let me expand on that...a God-given right to defend myself, which I happen to believe is protected by the Second Amendment...





top topics
 
76
<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in

join