It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by DestroyDestroyDestroy
Put the hatorade aside for a minute and observe that Bloomberg is a guy who is sexually attracted to women. There is nothing wrong, then, with him expressing his desire for sex with women; it is simply human nature. Could he do with some self-censorship in public? Sure. But if you're going to hate the guy, at least find valid reasons (of which there are many) and don't go grasping for straws.
I really think this goes towards the double standards that the progressives employ. If a conservative was caught scoping out a woman's rear, there would be marches, protests, calls to resign, calls to apologise, sensitivity classes to attend. . . the list goes on!
But because he's a nanny-state progressive, he gets a pass.edit on 23-3-2013 by beezzer because: (no reason given)
If he had a wife it'd be one thing....but this?
Some of you will get upset at things based solely if there is a D or R next to their names.
Oh come on, it's as if people expect public officials to be impervious to basic human desires
Maybe we just expect them to exhibit some professionalism and self control in public.