Originally posted by MaskedAvatar
bin Laden has not given any candidate a boost in ratings, he's had no effect. But I think bin Laden might do better in a second Bush term.
Bush can do no worse, so people showing good judgment would not invite him back to desecrate the office of President again.
BTW are the Bushes still as buddy-buddy with the bin Ladens as always? Can they organize flights to get them out of the US at the drop of a hat, when
all other fliights are grounded because a Bush fell asleep at the wheel?
Exactly - it's not possible for a president to do worse than Bush. As I said, the majority of eligible voters in America do not pay enough attention
to politics, thus they are easily persuaded by the media and peers. I doubt the majority of voters actually investigate the candidates and their
fallacies. Let's face it, most Americans don't wan't to waste their free-time researching politics, they are ignorant and not worthy of a
democratic-republic. I say, let's go full speed ahead to revolution. Another crappy presidency will bring it - we've seen how split our country is.
Well nevermind, we're too busy enjoying our wealth to care much about revolution, let's just enjoy our luxury (after all pleasure is more important
than anything else). ::SARCASM::
- Attero
P.S. I doubt many Americans even notice there are other candidates for the presidency than Bush and Kerry until they see the Ballot. We have the
biased media to blame for this! They are in total control of our government with their damned propaghanda! All media outlets have an agenda, and they
have destroyed our democratic-republic!
[edit on 1-11-2004 by Attero Auctorita]