posted on Mar, 28 2013 @ 03:49 PM
Originally posted by begoodbees
reply to post by Sigismundus
Wow, you are still missing the point. Everything you are presenting is proof that the Hebrew faith (the bible) is against homosexuality.
on 25-3-2013 by begoodbees because: (no reason given)
Um, no. What he is pointing out is that there are many many cases, even in the Bible of homosexuality, and that in most of those cases, the only
problem was with a dad who's pissed his kid wont give him an heir for the kingdom.
Again, Those sexually repressed monks who took the words of Paul literally (ever wonder why Paul didn't marry? Oddly enough, there are a lot of
Catholic priests who didn't marry, and they seem to have an apatite for men too. Not saying Paul was gay, but hey - if Paul were alive today, the
Christians in the country would label him that way and he'd be on the cover of TMZ.
At any rate, a bunch of monks who are translating Hebrew texts for the King seemed to find that the ONLY way to have sex - despite the Song of Songs,
is missionary with your wife... of course that's after she's had sex with the kings as is his right, even that THATS not in the bible either....
Look - gay relationships are bad for societies when those societies need more babies... um, like a kingdom that needs workers and soldiers....
THAT is why it's a SIN... not because anal sex is the devils way of casting you out of heaven.
All this, and I'm not even into dudes... jeeze!