[b]What Aerial Geo Engineering can do -- Is it Good or Bad[/b], page 3


Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 7-3-2013 @ 05:16 PM by abeverage
Originally posted by Phage
reply to
post by abeverage




Kind of interesting to see you take this side Phage.

What side?
What's interesting? Did something give you the idea that I'm in favor of pollution?
edit on 3/7/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)


No, no not at all but you usually take a very pro science stand, and don't strike me Global Warming/Climate Change believer (I could be wrong there). To me if we cannot curve CO2 (and that is not looking likely) we will need to deflect light and warmth or modify weather patterns.


reply posted on 7-3-2013 @ 05:26 PM by Phage
reply to post by abeverage


The science says we are seeing a warming trend.
The science also strongly indicates that the cause is primarily rising CO2 levels.
SRM would be an extreme measure and we are not (yet) at a point where such measures should be considered being used. Nor is the science regarding such measures strong enough (yet) to ensure that unforeseen and negative impacts would not occur.
edit on 3/7/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



NOAA Doc Strong Evidence They Are and Have Been Spraying Us
  Posted 15 days ago with 36 member flags
Chemtrail Programs Only Cost Us $5 Billion a Year
  Posted 5 days ago with 8 member flags
Cost analysis of aerosol solar radiation management published
  Posted 11 days ago with 6 member flags
How do elites escape chemtrails?
  Posted 1 days ago with 5 member flags
ChemTrails over Michigan
  Posted 11 days ago with 3 member flags
Geo-engineering (Chemtrails) and Bible Prophecy
  Posted 15 days ago with 2 member flags