Manchurian candidate? Glad he wasnt elected!

With the descrepencies in the circumstances of which discharge John Kerry actuallt received and when, the articles below even make me more uncomfortable....

Just how can one be 100% sure this man is capable of being the President of the United States?

Comments welcome, and more information on this subject is also.






Hanoi urged U.S. activists to run for office

One of three newly discovered Vietnam War documents shows Hanoi's communist regime encouraged the U.S. anti-war movement's new strategy in the early 1970s of urging members to run for public office, a path John Kerry took when he vied for a congressional seat in 1972.



Hanoi said it maintained "relations" with an anti-war group closely tied to Kerry that sought "to eliminate reactionary candidates and plant progressive people in the Senate and House of Representatives," according to a "circular" issued in December 1971 and captured by U.S. troops the following May.


worldnetdaily.com...



Another document ties Kerry to Hanoi


Another document
ties Kerry to Hanoi
3rd Vietnamese communist paper discovered in archive

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: October 28, 2004
1:00 a.m. Eastern


By Art Moore
� 2004 WorldNetDaily.com

A third, newly discovered Vietnamese war document presents further indication Hanoi orchestrated John Kerry's promotion of the communist regime's 1971 plan calling for virtual U.S. surrender.



As WorldNetDaily reported Tuesday, two documents found in a U.S. archive over the weekend provide the first concrete evidence that Vietnamese communists were directing Kerry's antiwar group Vietnam Veterans Against the War.









www.worldnetdaily.com...








Discovered papers: Hanoi directed Kerry
Recovered Vietnam documents 'smoking gun' researchers claim






MISSION: IMPLAUSIBLE Discovered papers:
Hanoi directed Kerry Recovered Vietnam documents
'smoking gun' researchers claim
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: October 26, 2004
1:00 a.m. Eastern


The first documentary evidence that Vietnamese communists were directly steering John Kerry's group Vietnam Veterans Against the War has been discovered in a U.S. archive, according to a researcher who spoke with WorldNetDaily.




Vietnamese Communist Party leader Le Duc Tho delivered to Paris a plan promoted by John Kerry.




One freshly unearthed document, captured by the U.S. from Vietnamese communists in 1971 and later translated, indicates the Viet Cong and North Vietnamese delegations to the Paris peace talks that year were used as the communications link to direct the activities of Kerry and other antiwar activists who attended.

Kerry insists he attended the talks only because he happened to be in France on his honeymoon and maintains he met with both sides. But previously revealed records indicate the future senator made two, and possibly three, trips to Paris to meet with Viet Cong leader Madame Nguyen Thi Binh then promote her plan's demand for U.S. surrender.












www.worldnetdaily.com...







[edit on 31-10-2004 by edsinger]

[edit on 1-11-2004 by edsinger]

[edit on 4-11-2004 by edsinger]

Well Well, one day until we alll go vote, and on this board the overwhelming portion will vote for the man that has done the above listed things. Just one thing to think of as you cast that ballot, "If Kerry were such and hinest man deserving of the Presidential position, why will he not release his FULL records? Why do the right wing folks keep putting this stuff in front of me?"

The answer is, because at a later time, you can not say you didnt know..........Now get out there and vote for the man who has a discharge he doesnt want you to see and the man that Osama wants in office


Happy Voting

Originally posted by edsinger
Just how can one be 100% sure this man is capable of being the President of the United States?

My read of the situation has been that while people can't be 100% sure Kerry is capable of being president, they have already seen that Bush is not capable, and are looking for an option.

But either way, kind of a sad state of affairs when an entire election campaign is solely based on slandering the other candidate. Surely there are actual issues that the US could be concerned with?

Would you vote for a PM who did this is Nam? Aussies where there also?