It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
3.2. SAI Implementation Increasing average global temperatures and the correspondingly increasing damages from climate change will likely prompt increasing interest in some form of geoengineering. Many different geoengineering schemes have been proposed (Keith 2000), though each has certain limitations. For example:
While modern society is quite different from these societies, it may be even more vulnerable to disruptions due to its high degree of global interconnectedness (Hanson 2008). For these reasons, intermittency is cited as a core reason to avoid SAI (Goes et al. 2011).
Originally posted by mrperplexed
Like I said, I used to be on the "those are contrails" side of the fence.
Something tells me that with the Siberian Shelf emitting methane at an alarming rate, that mitigation is already taking place.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by mrperplexed
Like I said, I used to be on the "those are contrails" side of the fence.
Something tells me that with the Siberian Shelf emitting methane at an alarming rate, that mitigation is already taking place.
What is that something??
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by mrperplexed
Fair enough. sorry about that.
Originally posted by mrperplexed
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by mrperplexed
Fair enough. sorry about that.
No apology necessary.
(source given in OP).
If SAI is implemented by a broad international coalition, many of whose members have the capacity to implement SAI on their own, then the magnitude of the collapse may need to be very large to induce intermittency—a significant global catastrophe. For comparison, neither the combined event of World War I and the 1918 flu nor World War II would have been large enough
Originally posted by network dude
reply to post by mrperplexed
What are your thoughts on this? I am curious as to why you posted, if not to discuss?
Do you think this paper is proof of spraying?
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by mrperplexed
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by mrperplexed
Fair enough. sorry about that.
No apology necessary.
I wasn't apologising. I was expressing my sorrow that you have fallen for the disinfo.
Originally posted by fireyaguns