It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Recently, there was a black hole that belched out a good amount of material.
Your premise is off to a bad start. No material is ejected from a black hole.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by BigBrotherDarkness
Recently, there was a black hole that belched out a good amount of material.
Your premise is off to a bad start. No material is ejected from a black hole.
www.scientificamerican.com...
Scientists think somehow galaxies are ridding themselves of much of the mass that would have ended up falling into their central black holes. However, until now researchers have been at a lack for an explanation of how this might happen.
news.discovery.com...
Based on these observations, astronomers believe that a blob of hot gas formed in the accretion disk around the black hole.
To everywhere. It's the universe.
to wince did this big bang go to?
From a singularity which no longer exists.
From where did this big bang arise?
Bad? There actually is plenty of evidence that the big bang occured and inflation is ongoing.
It's about as bad as creationism...
You don't understand what a scientific theory is. It is not "just speculation".
The big bang theory is just a theory and although it is accepted by a bunch in science, it is just speculation that is accepted.
Yeah. Like we all laugh at Galileo and Newton. Funny.
In a hundred years I expect everyone to be laughing at the Big Bang Theory, just as they do the tv show.
So a singularity can just vanish into nothingness?
The CMB and all other forms of matter and energy as well as space time.
So the big bang disappears as cosmic back ground radiation...and the singularity is all of the universe left behind?
What you postulate is a redistribution of matter and energy created by the big bang, not the creation of all matter, energy, and space time.
How is that any different than what I postulate?
Space time and electromagnetic energy mostly but some gas, some dust, some dark matter.
so what is between the galaxies?
Maybe because you haven't bothered to look at the theory in any depth. The questions you're asking are among the simplest and there are explanations. You also don't seem to consider the fact that "empty space" actually is something. Something measurable.
Why is there specs of huddled masses called galaxies...with seemly nothing but empty space in between? If there was one big bang why the separation? Sorry but that logic of one does not hold in my opinion, hence why I am still looking for answers myself, instead of just accepting other theories as a belief.
Scientific theories are not "beliefs". They are based on evidence. What do you base your opinions on? Do you know much about astrophysics or are you just shooting from the hip?
Sorry but that logic of one does not hold in my opinion, hence why I am still looking for answers myself, instead of just accepting other theories as a belief.
It makes sense for me but it certain doesn't make the world safe. There are a lot of scary things out there. Why even bother with your opinions if they are based on nothing but your opinion? Cosmologists don't claim to know everything but that doesn't mean they know nothing. They base their ideas on something other than opinion. It should also be pointed out that they do not all agree on everything.
Are so certain in these theories that you just believe them? I suppose that's makes the world a safe and comfy place to live...why even bother with theories to begin with, if one is apt to blind belief?
The universe is a very large box there's plenty of room. But I know what you meant. Before thinking "outside the box", it's helpful to have some understanding of what is "inside the box."
Sorry but I can't live in that box with you.