It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
so what makes you an expert on ancient artifacts. I think you just like to take the proverbial. Diddnt you see wheres wally? Classic detractor im affraid. Get someone with some credentials to evaluate it. Some people eh
Originally posted by symptomoftheuniverse
yes its a glitch apparently. I highlighted that in my other thread.
oh dear you dont read threads do you? I cant upload pictures from my phyawn! Yet you still detract. If others can find it and post pics why cant you?
Originally posted by Severin
Originally posted by symptomoftheuniverse
yes its a glitch apparently. I highlighted that in my other thread.
We are now 4 pages into this thread and you still haven't provided any evidence of your 'propeller'. You've been asked numerous times to point it out on an image and here we are still waiting.
And any archeologists or engineer can see this aint no rock.
If others can find it and post pics why cant you?
Originally posted by symptomoftheuniverse
This pic is clear,its not blurry, its a freakin freak of a rock. And any archeologists or engineer can see this aint no rock.
i am not arken although i love his threads,the problem is the clarity of his pictures dont really clarify. My pic is clear and shows a propeller like object. Still cant see it.
Originally posted by Severin
reply to post by symptomoftheuniverse
Well thats where you're wrong, i have read the entire thread and yes I did so that you are on your phone, but anyone with any sense would have prepared the thread properly with images to back up your claim. You can rave on about how clear it is and how every expert would instantly recognise it, but I ask you... how many other posters here have said YES I SEE IT?
Not many by my count.
Follow the example of Arken, he goes to great lengths to construct a valuable thread, but yours...Its just poor threadmanship in my opinion.
why do you think that? Is it because its on mars? Please tell me your reasoning.
Originally posted by aorAki
Originally posted by symptomoftheuniverse
This pic is clear,its not blurry, its a freakin freak of a rock. And any archeologists or engineer can see this aint no rock.
However, this geologist CAN see that it's a rock.
Originally posted by symptomoftheuniverse
i am not arken although i love his threads,the problem is the clarity of his pictures dont really clarify. My pic is clear and shows a propeller like object. Still cant see it.
Originally posted by Severin
reply to post by symptomoftheuniverse
Well thats where you're wrong, i have read the entire thread and yes I did so that you are on your phone, but anyone with any sense would have prepared the thread properly with images to back up your claim. You can rave on about how clear it is and how every expert would instantly recognise it, but I ask you... how many other posters here have said YES I SEE IT?
Not many by my count.
Follow the example of Arken, he goes to great lengths to construct a valuable thread, but yours...Its just poor threadmanship in my opinion.
the rocks nearby are not smooth at all, they are not of similar type. I wouldnt employ you as a geologist.just noticed the edit.
Originally posted by aorAki
I guess I'm using parsimony as well as my trained eye. It's in a rock field, full of rocks, rocks, sediment, rocks and no machinery (that I can tell).
Therefore I am stating that this is more likely to be a rock than a propeller, due to the fact that (despite wishful thinking) it is surrounded by what look like other rocks of similar type, as well as what appear to be other types of rocks. It seems there are vesicular rocks as well as smooth rocks.
edit on 25-2-2013 by aorAki because: added
Originally posted by symptomoftheuniverse
the rocks nearby are not smooth at all, they are not of similar type. I wouldnt employ you as a geologist.just noticed the edit.
Originally posted by aorAki
I guess I'm using parsimony as well as my trained eye. It's in a rock field, full of rocks, rocks, sediment, rocks and no machinery (that I can tell).
Therefore I am stating that this is more likely to be a rock than a propeller, due to the fact that (despite wishful thinking) it is surrounded by what look like other rocks of similar type, as well as what appear to be other types of rocks. It seems there are vesicular rocks as well as smooth rocks.
edit on 25-2-2013 by aorAki because: addededit on 25-2-2013 by symptomoftheuniverse because: noticed edit.
criticise? You state its a rock and the reason you give is wrong. Dont take the hump because i caught you out on a assumptions.ask nasa how big it is.
Originally posted by aorAki
Originally posted by symptomoftheuniverse
the rocks nearby are not smooth at all, they are not of similar type. I wouldnt employ you as a geologist.just noticed the edit.
Originally posted by aorAki
I guess I'm using parsimony as well as my trained eye. It's in a rock field, full of rocks, rocks, sediment, rocks and no machinery (that I can tell).
Therefore I am stating that this is more likely to be a rock than a propeller, due to the fact that (despite wishful thinking) it is surrounded by what look like other rocks of similar type, as well as what appear to be other types of rocks. It seems there are vesicular rocks as well as smooth rocks.
edit on 25-2-2013 by aorAki because: addededit on 25-2-2013 by symptomoftheuniverse because: noticed edit.
I wouldn't employ you as a human!
See, it's easy to criticise others with insults.
I prefer to criticise you with reason.
Well, you're only seeing what you want to see and dismissing anything that goes against your premise.
There are smooth rocks nearby as well as vesicular rocks.
Tell me, what is the scale of those rocks?
What size do you think the 'propeller' (looks like sandstone, or a fine-grained igneous rock) is?
, its a freakin freak of a rock.
i thought cement needed lime,from limestone.
Originally posted by aorAki
I'm not taking the hump at all.
It just irks me that you can't see that it IS a rock, surrounded by other, like, rocks.
That is all.
However, feel free to carry on with your wishful thinking fantasies. You may actually discover something one day, like how to recognise rocks.
You provided the claim, it is up to you to prove it. Thus, YOU need to find out what the scale is in that image.
Me, I know it is a rock. I'm happy with that. I can live comfortably with that fact and I'm excited by the fact that there are rocks there, that we can learn a lot about the environment from those rocks and that in my lab there are people using earth rocks to try to make Martian cement.
These earth rocks are chemically very very similar to the chemistry of rocks one would find on Mars.
Now, that is one source of excitement for me: to be involved in a project that has long term and significantly positive outcomes.edit on 25-2-2013 by aorAki because: formatting
Originally posted by symptomoftheuniverse
i thought cement needed lime,from limestone.