Felony Prosecution For Salmonella-Peanut Executives, page 1


Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 23 times
Topic started on 25-2-2013 @ 05:52 AM by SilentKoala

Felony Prosecution For Salmonella-Peanut Executives


www.wired.com
A pretty extraordinary thing happened Thursday, here in Georgia: A district court in the middle part of the state unsealed a 76-count, 52-page indictment of former officials of the Peanut Corporation of America (PCA), charging them with fraud and conspiracy for knowingly distributing peanut products contaminated with Salmonella.

(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 25-2-2013 @ 06:37 AM by vkey08
reply to post by TrueBrit



My guess is that's why they are being prosecuted and rightfully so. Add to that list the compounding pharmacy up in Massachusetts that allowed it's customers to be injected with tainted spinal injections, or (insert other ruthlessly greedy morons here)

Hopefully this is a trend.. A check and balance as it were.


reply posted on 25-2-2013 @ 06:42 AM by gladtobehere
reply to post by SilentKoala


Yah, nuts. Thats bad for sure. Cant have bad, evil nuts. Good job government.

What about when Bayer knowingly distributed HIV infected blood. Hmmm...

Those nuts guys need a bigger lobby.



edit on 25-2-2013 by gladtobehere because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 25-2-2013 @ 08:58 AM by Ex_CT2
Originally posted by gladtobehere
reply to
post by SilentKoala


Yah, nuts. Thats bad for sure. Cant have bad, evil nuts. Good job government.

What about when Bayer knowingly distributed HIV infected blood. Hmmm...

Those nuts guys need a bigger lobby.



Indeed. You pay your "protection" money or you take the consequences. Obviously the guy was too cheap to get the checks out without complaint, and did himself in....


reply posted on 25-2-2013 @ 09:52 AM by NthOther
Contamination in the food supply is the result of mass agriculture--the processes involved in growing and distributing food on a massive scale. You can point fingers at this company or that, these people or those, and punish them accordingly, but it will never change anything. Society demands that other people grow and distribute their own food for them, destroying entire ecosystems and tainting their "products" in the process of doing so.

Well... what did you think was going to happen? You clear entire forests to cultivate one crop (let's say... peanuts), and then wonder why every insect on the planet that likes peanuts seems to be concentrated in the same area. And then all the rodents that like the insects and the peanuts move in and saturate the area with feces (which would be fine if it were given time to break down into the soil naturally, but it isn't). Then the peanuts are picked and, again, stored under conditions that are ripe for bacterial, fungal, and viral contamination. Etc., etc.

I won't even get into the energy resources extracted and expended so that everyone can have said coveted peanuts. Suffice it to say that, if you're looking for someone (or some company) to blame when people get sick, you're barking up the wrong tree. The entire production and distribution system makes these instances inevitable, and with increasing regularity. When it really comes down to it, the only way to know your food is safe is to abandon the conventional system entirely and either grow/raise your own or, at the very least, stick to locally produced and distributed sources.

All this witch hunt does is give the do-gooders an ego boost.


reply posted on 25-2-2013 @ 11:22 AM by rickymouse
reply to post by gladtobehere



Interesting, seems like the FDA doesn't care about people in the other countries in the world. I thought these were allies of ours. I guess the Pharma Execs are above the law. Why didn't our allies take legal action against these big corporations, I suppose the people involved were deemed as drags on their society so didn't care. Maybe the payoffs to the high officials of those countries was adequate to keep quiet.


reply posted on 26-2-2013 @ 11:55 AM by votan
reply to post by SilentKoala



Corps are required to make profits for their investors at any cost. i am not sure why you people are surprised


reply posted on 26-2-2013 @ 01:25 PM by Aazadan
Originally posted by votan
reply to
post by SilentKoala



Corps are required to make profits for their investors at any cost. i am not sure why you people are surprised


Legally they're only required to do everything they can to try and increase share prices. Those are tied to growth more than profitability.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Israel angered over IAEA vote on nuclear arsenal
  Posted 13 days ago with 79 member flags
Neil Armstrong dead at age 82 - report
  Posted 17 days ago with 63 member flags
Judge orders release of detained Marine veteran
  Posted 19 days ago with 58 member flags
Birds hold \'funerals\' for dead
  Posted 10 days ago with 55 member flags
TSA agents swarm Ron Paul\'s plane, demand explosives check
  Posted 11 days ago with 47 member flags
Mysterious Changes in Ocean Salt Spur NASA Expedition
  Posted 1 days ago with 36 member flags
Ga. Murder Case Uncovers Terror Plot by Soldiers
  Posted 15 days ago with 32 member flags