posted on Feb, 13 2013 @ 01:09 AM
reply to post by Mr Tranny
"So the corporation, as an extension of the owner, has a right to speak. Any restriction on that corporation, is a restriction on the owner’s right
to use his property to voice his opinion"
does your car speak for you? do you send you fridge to vote for you?
i have no problem with people using the company as a voice, but when that voice $%^&s up, and breaks the law, the voice should ALL go to jail. not
pay a fine. so i have no problem with a person using the 500 thousand employees as a mouth piece, so long as the "voice of the company" means that
eveyone in the company goes to jail for breaking the law.
companies are not people, never has been, the argument you have put forth is the corruption that started it in the first place. the companies are made
up of people. those people have a say. its called VOTING by allowing people to have TWO voices one through company and one through "self" you are
cheating the system.
making a company didnt create a child, it created a group of people who ALREADY HAVE THOSE RIGHTS, why should companies get multiple choices/voices.
if the companies big enough , and the people in the company care enough, they can sway laws using their personal vote just like anyone can round up
neighborhoods and encourage people to vote a certain way.
this company is a persona BS is whats $%^&ing the system up with all this lobbying BS. get rid of the lobbyist, it should be illegal. i dont have the
abilty to hand 350k to someone and say go sway a vote for us, wtf should they?
its corrupt and should be abolished.